Ah, the fine exercise of logic in the service of Jennifer Roeback Morse’s relationship advice is just too precious:
Jennifer Roback Morse, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, has been tracing the effects of no-fault divorce throughout the culture.
Hooray!
As she makes clear, “The legal innovation of unilateral divorce began to reduce marriage to nothing but a temporary association of individuals. If marriage is merely a free association of individuals, there is no principled reason to exclude same-sex couples, or even larger groupings of sexual partners[.]
We don’t often agree with Jennifer, but we’ll give her this much: there is no principled reason to exclude homosexuals in relationships who meet the same criteria and are willing to meet the same burdens, as heterosexuals who wish to marry. But how did we get to polygamy from there? [-Just be glad she didn’t throw in bestiality, –Mickey Kaus’ editor.] So far then, only a little bit silly. [“Well, there’s a big swing here to the silly party; but how big a swing I’m not going to tell you.”]
The revolution in America’s divorce laws has produced a situation in which one spouse may demand and cause the breakup of the marriage, even if the other spouse is committed to maintaining the relationship.
And wouldn’t want to live in a world where one person can force another one to stay in a mariage? Indeed — why not make it impossible to break up?
George: “I-I’ve given this a lot of thought. I’m sorry, but we, uh, we have to break up.”
Maura: “No.”
George: “What’s that?”
Maura: “We’re not breaking up.”
George: “We’re not?”
Maura: “No.”
George: “All right.”



