A Boomerang Is Not A Bomb-Delivery Device

schlussel_turkish_toilet

ABOVE: Debbie Schlussel, blogging


Debbie Schlussel is all over a televison anchorwoman in Detroit, who hasn’t been to law school like Debbie has and who fell for a juvenile prank where someone wrote to the TV station and asked her to mention the 69th birthday of “Eaton Beaver.”

I debated whether I should post this video of the brainless local TV anchors in Detroit getting punked and p3wned in the most low-class and tasteless of ways. But I’ve decided to post it to point out, yet again, how easy the mainstream media are fooled into repeating anything they’re fed without using the tiniest of fact-checking, or in this case, common sense and brains. You didn’t have to be Einstein to catch this filthy prank.

Funny you should mention fact-checking, common sense and brains, Debbiecakes, after only just hours before you ran this:

The other day we all heard news that pitch Black actor Jamie Foxx (slave name: Eric Bishop) is being seriously considered to play Frank Sinatra in a bio-flick about “Old Blue Eyes.”

And so, in this vein, when I read that, yesterday, DreamWorks Studios announced plans for the “first big-screen portrayal of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.,” I was thinking of who should have a serious shot of playing him.

And I was thinking–of course!–it should be . . . OWEN WILSON. After all, we’ve moved beyond the race thing. And who better to play Dr. King than the very blond, very pale White Owen Wilson.

I mean, after all, Wilson looks as much like King as Foxx looks like Sinatra.

Well, after a few seconds doing some fact-checking with Teh Gazoogle, it appears that this laughably improbable story about the Sinatra film is not only laughably improbable but also, well, completely wrong and, better yet, the result of an obvious joke. The website Gawker made a funny about having Jamie Foxx play Frank Sinatra. The Telegraph, a right-wing British fish wrapper, completely fell for the joke and printed it as an example of U.S.political correctness run amok, adding for good measure a few of its own fabricated details. And Frau Schlüsselstöllen, fresh from upbraiding the Em-Ess-Em for for repeating anything it was fed without the tiniest of fact-checking, fell for this ridiculous nonsense from a wingnut newspaper faster than a local newscaster could offer birthday congrats to Eaton Beaver, Connie Lingus, and Jack Inhof. As they say, you don’t have to be Einstein . . .

 

Another Really Smart Idea To Save The GOP

william_jacobsen

ABOVE: William Jacobson, perfesser, blogger and American Thinker
columnist


William Jacobson, who’s some kind of professor at Cornell Law and who first achieved wingnut-o-sphere notoriety by breathlessly peddling PouponGate, is sick and tired of seeing only white people get their stuff nationalized and thinks it’s high time some Negroes get nationalized as well. And who better than the descendants of Martin Luther King? Instead of just abandoning King’s work into the public domain and moving into some dilapidated crack house in Newark to live on welfare, the King family has had the temerity and the uppity-ness to charge for licenses to use King’s intellectual property.

I am against this trampling of individual property rights, which are the foundation of our democracy. But if it is going to happen because of the large Democrat majorities in Congress and Obama’s personal popularity,1 then there is one aspect of the economy Democrats should nationalize before anything else: The history of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Actually, since Jacobson doesn’t propose that the United States pay anything for the King rights, he should know, as a law professor, even an “assistant clinical law professor,” that the correct word is not nationalization but expropriation. But the Kings don’t deserve compensation because of their devious plan to force children to spend months studying Martin Luther King and then to pay royalties to the King Estate for the privilege.

We created a national MLK holiday in 1986, thereby elevating MLK to a position in the nation’s history almost unparalleled in over 200 years. Virtually every school in the country devotes more time to discussing MLK’s legacy than the history of any president or war.

I’d like to see some support for the last assertion there, but I suspect that the support involved Jacobson putting one hand behind his back, delving deeply into a particular cavity, and then pulling the support out of said cavity with a grand flourish, a spray of dingleberries and a self-satisfied smile.

Few people realize that reprinting the “I Have a Dream” speech without permission of MLK’s family, and in many cases the payment of royalties, will result at a minimum in a nasty lawyer letter, and even a lawsuit. These efforts to maintain copyright control over MLK’s speeches are international in scope.

The latest example is an attempt by two MLK family members to stop a film about MLK’s life because some copyrighted material was used without permission or payment of royalties:

DreamWorks plans the first big-screen portrayal of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s life, the studio announced Tuesday, but two of King’s children immediately threatened legal action because the film deal was brokered without their blessing.

My, oh, my, for an assistant clinical law perfessor, Jacobson shur don’t reed zo gud. The linked article noted that the King Estate had indeed licensed the movie and received royalties. Two of the three King children are complaining not because DreamWorks didn’t have permission or didn’t pay royalties. They are complaining about how the Estate is run and have sued the Estate.

For MLK’s family members, the economic structure they have created could not be better. They have nationalized2 their father’s persona, but profit by controlling the written and spoken words which memorialize his history. While the foundation may be not-for-profit, the salaries and other perks the family garners are hardly not-for-nothing.

Gee, that’s just outrageous. I can’t think of any other instance of a family of a famous man profiting from his legacy, can you? Do we get to expropriate that estate too?

The time has come to end this madness. If Democrats are going to nationalize much of the economy over the protests of Republicans and independents, then Democrats should first nationalize Martin Luther King, Jr.’s history, including the “I Have a Dream” speech.

The dean of the University of Tennessee Law School has reportedly sent a letter to his counterpart at the Cornell Law School thanking Cornell for snatching from Tennessee the distinction of being the law school with the most embarrassing right wing blogger.


1The professor never explains how the “large Democrat majorities” got not only into Congress but also into Obama’s personal popularity.

2The perfesser don’t right zo gud neether. The family can’t “nationalize” anything, only the Democrat Socialist Islamic Red Maoist Gay Marriage party and its leader Obama can “nationalize” things. Perhaps he means that they have made King a national hero, although one has to imagine that King had much more to do with that than did his children.

 

Ideas To Save The Republican Party

‘Snarkandboobs,’ RedState:
Pry my Burger and Fries Out of My Cold Dead Hands

  • Indeed, the FDA sending a letter to a cereal manufacturer1 is the Kristallnacht of a total clampdown on all human activity by Nazi buzzsaw robots with boiling lava cannons,2 but I got one that’ll really steam people’s corndogs: The average life expectancy in America is too high, blar-har-har.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Notes:

1 Cf.

2 Cf.

This week’s General Mills™ Conservative Spirit Award goes to Edward Dalere or D. Alereed at Free Republic:

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Does anyone ever read those stupid lables on food?

103 posted on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:16:40 PM by dalereed

District Attorney LeReed may pick up his award by calling our acting compliance officer, Ms. Aïda Bolladix, at extension 1337.

 

Laff Out Loud

Shorter Arthur Laffer & Stephen Moore

laffer_curve
ABOVE: Dr. Arthur Laffer (right) and his famous curve (left).

“Soak the Rich, Lose the Rich”

  • States, you have tried your best to tax rich people and have failed miserably. The lesson is: never try.*

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


*cf.

 

Shorter Stephen Green


Above: Prepped for mud, rugged terrain.

“Rules of the Road, and Off”

  • Having been long ago initiated into the robust cult of 4×4 manliness even though I rarely if ever drive my Wrangler off pavement, I am well aware of all waving traditions between Jeep enthusiasts which are quite lost on effete, eco-car-driving, pussy fagg0rts.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Agnus Douthat, Qui Tollis … etc., etc.

Shorter Ross Douthat:

douthat

Ross Douthat, New York Times
Dan Brown’s America

  • Everything the Roman Catholic Church says is true, and Dan Brown is going to hell for suggesting otherwise in a work of fiction. Instead of spreading calumny about Roman Catholics, best-selling authors should instead spread calumny about the Gaypiscopal Church, with its big old gay bishop.* Next week, I’m writing a column on the Immaculate Conception, which most people incorrectly think refers to the virgin birth of Jesus but which instead refers to the virgin birth of the Virgin Mary. It will also be a great opportunity to explain the difference between the Assumption and the Ascension. After that, maybe I’ll do something on the favorite breakfast foods of the popes. Cross-posted at Catholic Digest.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


*Cf. “Liberal … believers often encounter a God who’s too busy validating their particular version of the American Dream to raise a peep about, say, … how many times they’ve been married.” Click Douthat’s link for teh gay.
 

And Now A Word From Benjamin Shapiro Legal Consulting

Shorter Ben Shapiro:

ben_toilet

Ben Shapiro, Human Wingnuts Online:
If You Disagree With Obama, Are You Anti-American?

  • It is only un-American to criticize a Republican President. In fact, it is your patriotic duty to criticize a Democrat Socialist President like Barack Hitler Hussein Lenin X Stalin Obama who threatened to invade the United Kingdom unless they banned Michael Savage, who plans on sending investors to concentration camps and who is going to rename our country the United Socialist States of America.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Flip. Flop.

breitbart_snuggie

(No Photoshop was used in harming this
wingnut.)


I hate to admit it, but I feel sorry for Andrew Breitbart’s wife. No, really, I do. Mr. Breitbart is such a quivering doughboy of outrage that she can’t even go to brunch with him in Santa Monica without him making an utter fool of himself.

So, here are Andy and Mrs. Andy at Shutters in Santa Monica, unable to afford a full meal but splurging for some dip and a couple of margaritas.

Soon after our drinks arrived, a group of mostly-college-age kids began walking by in large bunches, many in tandem holding large rope segments in groups of 20 or so. They clearly were marching for something they considered important.

As they passed, the protesters stared sourly at the second story where we sat. Fellow patrons wondered aloud what this now massive conga line was all about. About 300 people into the procession, I spotted a sign that had “war” written in it. One T-shirt read, “Stop forcing our children to be your soldiers.”

It’s a voluntary army, you stupid kids!

Of course, you can see where this is going. Breitbart starts to seethe that these dirty fucking hippies are just like everybody else in Hollywood, always trying to ruin his tequila buzz with their liberal antics.

Knowing that Susie considers a true escape a day when politics isn’t on the menu, I kept my observations to myself.

Susan, no doubt, is beginning to regret that she didn’t put on a burqa before heading out with Andy.

I even restrained my natural impulse to run down to the sand to go mano a mano with the rabble-rousers.

The idea of Andy imagining himself going all Hulk against a thousand or so protesters is really quite tragic, but, fortunately for Andy, the probability of him abandoning an alcoholic beverage to go tussle with a crowd of demonstrators is about the same as the probability that he will one day visit a barber or wash and iron a shirt before putting it on again.

Then came the liberal fist of a doom, the gesture so evil, so powerful, that Andy could no longer restrain himself and knew that it was time to exhibit his brave and manly middle finger to Hollywood and the rest of the world:

But when one dude raised his fist like runners Tommie Smith and John Carlos did at the 1968 Mexico City Olympics, I could not hold myself back. I jumped from my seat and bolted to the center of the balcony, where the American flag waved furiously in a now-harsh wind. Positioned next to Old Glory, I countered the young punk and reached out my right arm directing my middle finger in his direction.

As soon as my finger was raised, a phalanx of photographers began snapping away at the white middle-aged man wearing a white LaCoste shirt next to the old red, white and blue. Cognizant of the power of imagery, I owned the moment and refused to back down. The fist wielder immediately dropped his arm. I clearly had won and envisioned photos of the anti-antiwar protester making the front pages of the Los Angeles Times.

I think that’s what’s called going Mitty.1

Happily for Andy, but quite sadly for Sadly, No!, there is no record of this image of an enraged dumpy-assed white guy standing on the balcony at Shutters flipping everyone the bird.2

Here’s the punch line: several days later, Andy gets an email from one of the photographers wondering why a march “in solidarity for the children abducted and forced to fight for the LRA in Northern Uganda and more recently in the Congo” caused Andy to get so worked up. The photographer continued:

I believe most people in America are in agreement that human slavery, genocide and child soldiers are a terrible thing. This event was hardly controversial. The protest marched by ‘Shutters on the Beach.’ After reviewing the photographs I was taking for the event and confirming the facts (you were in Santa Monica at the date and time) I realized you were flipping the protesters off. I am curious to why this is the case.

Well the answer is simple: because Andy is a tosspot who sees a liberal conspiracy behind everything from today’s weather to the placement of forks to the left of the dinner plate. That’s why.


1Cf.


“The cannonading has got the wind up in young Raleigh, sir,” said the sergeant. Captain Mitty looked up at him through tousled hair. “Get him to bed,” he said wearily. “With the others. I’ll fly alone.” “But you can’t, sir,” said the sergeant anxiously. “It takes two men to handle that bomber and the Archies are pounding hell out of the air. Von Richtman’s circus is between here and Saulier.” “Somebody’s got to get that ammunition dump,” said Mitty. “I’m going over. Spot of brandy?” He poured a drink for the sergeant and one for himself. War thundered and whined around the dugout and battered at the door. … He poured another brandy and tossed it off. “I never see a man could hold his brandy like you, sir,” said the sergeant. “Begging your pardon, sir.” Captain Mitty stood up and strapped on his huge Webley-Vickers automatic. “It’s forty kilometers through hell, sir,” said the sergeant. … Walter Mitty walked to the door of the dugout humming “Auprès de Ma Blonde.” He turned and waved to the sergeant. “Cheerio!” he said. . .

2The real question this incident raises is why someone like Breitbart, who is about as photogenic as road kill after two days in August on a highway in Georgia, is always leaping up and throwing himself in front of a camera lens.

 

That reminds me of something…

Reading this entry from Steve M. at No More Mister Nice Blog…:

THE BUNKER, AS OPPOSED TO THE OTHER BUNKER?

First of all, I’m not sure how it compromises the vice president’s security to say that in an emergency he might be where he actually lives, but hey, I’m not Fox News:

Biden Reveals Location of Secret VP Bunker

Vice President Joe Biden, well-known for his verbal gaffes, may have finally outdone himself, divulging potentially classified information meant to save the life of a sitting vice president.

…brings back old memories of this little flash animation from way back

 

Destiny Is A Fickle Bitch

vincent

ABOVE: Vincent


This has not been a good Sunday so far. While looking for fodder to entertain you SadlyNauts I made a shocking — no, abominably horrifying — discovery. Only now, after several shots of scotch, am I sufficiently composed to reveal that soul-shattering discovery.

I agree with Ben Shapiro. And with the Jonah the Whale.

Ben Shapiro says that Lost is the best show on television. Which is true and which anyone would have to admit who saw last Wednesday’s season five finale. The only thing that keeps me from slitting my wrists over this unfortunate agreement with the preposterous little twit is that in his post he gets just about everything about the show wrong. No, Ben, Jacob’s newly-revealed nemesis isn’t the smoke monster and he isn’t in control of the smoke monster.

And as to the Pantload, well, he’s right about dogs.

I am now going to go see how much scotch it takes to erase this terrible reality from my mind. I think it will be an enormous quantity. In the meantime, consider this an open thread. And, just to prove that we are bigger people than the trolls, I am declaring troll amnesty for this thread and this thread alone. The disemvoweller and I have an appointment with a bottle of Macallan 18.