Immortality Is A Two-Way Street

Thanks to free-market health care I have enjoyed no visits to the doctor in over five years but plenty of French wine and Japanese sushi so now I will live forever but I growed bored with it, so please Obamacare kill me in my tracks … it will be worth the better standard of living. Also, insofar as whereby lager, such as.

PS DID YOU KNOW – if you averaged eight hours of sleep over your lifetime, but I average seven, I haved live an average of 13.6 years longer conscious life than you, but you were better rested.

 

Ignorance is Bliss

grooming_noel_sheppard2
ABOVE: Noel Sheppard and Unidentified Monkey (right)

Shorter Noel Sheppard, NewsBlusters
CBS Adds Fuel to the Racism Fire Stoked By Gates Arrest
(link fixed)

  • The best way to heal the racial divide in this country is for the news media to stop reporting cases of white police officers harassing black men.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

The Distinguished Mathematician From Texas

Via SteveB in teh comments, by way of Amy Goodman, here’s Congressman Louis Gohmert (R-Tex):

Well, if you go to the socialized medicine countries, you find about 20 percent worse results. You get it? One in five people have to die because they went to socialized medicine! Now, I’ve got three daughters and a wife. I would hate to think that, among five women, one of them is going to die because we go to socialized care, and we have to have these long lists.

SteveB notes:

I wouldn’t trust any health care statistics that come from a guy who adds up ‘three daughters and a wife’ and gets ‘five women’.

Yeah … or maybe the GOP politicians have given up all pretenses and are just automatically including their mistresses now.

At any rate, this is a useful enough place to tell a tale of ‘socialized medicine’. When I was living in Thailand, anybody could see a doctor for 20 baht. That’s about 50 cents US. Think about that for a goddamn second. And Thai doctors and dentists and nurses are generally well-trained (often in Western countries) and every one I ever encountered was highly competent.

Now, you still had to pay for any drugs you needed, but they were subsidized and pretty cheap. And procedures cost a bit, but not much. I had major dental work done — couple of root canals and two crowns — for about $150. Two C-section births at a very good, private hospital cost about $300 each … my two sons are healthy little fellas, alas, my marriage to their mom, not so much.

But you can also pay through the nose for the very best care if you have the loot. I happened to be insured by my work when I needed an appendectomy (the plan didn’t cover pregnancies, btw) so I went to the world-class Bumrungrad Hospital for the surgery. Cost a bit of scratch, it’s true — but at any rate, the Rep. Gohmerts can rest assured that socialized health care doesn’t have to eliminate the overpriced doctoring that they so clearly cherish.

Thailand also happens to be the No. 1 destination for people seeking sex change operations. ‘BWAHAHA,’ one imagines the wingnuts will reply, but those are tricky procedures and indicative of the caliber of the medical profession in that country. A country where you can see a doctor for 50-fucking-cents.

 

Let My White People Go!

kevin_aylward
ABOVE: Kevin Aylward (left)

Shorter Kevin Aylward, CheezWhiz Blog
Police Have 911 And Dispatch Tapes In Gates Case

  • Even though I haven’t heard the alleged audio tape of the encounter between Professor Gates and the cop who arrested him, I am sure that it proves that the only racist that day was Gates

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Also, You Are More Likely To Be Killed By A Sasquatch There

Via Think Progress, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Church):

When you tell people that the mortality rate in Canada is 25% higher for breast cancer, 18% higher for prostate cancer, you know, they say why in the world would we emulate a system like that? This is life threatening.

And then when you tell those people that the mortality rate for mortality is 3% higher in the United States, they’re all, so why in the world did you give me that line of bullshit about breast cancer and prostrates, you stone-faced Okie gargoyle?


Brad adds: OHGOODYOHGOODYOHGOODY!!!! I’ve been waiting to do one of these! Let’s get started, shall we?

Circulatory disease deaths per 100,000:

  • Canada: 219
  • United States: 265

Child maltreatment deaths per 100,000:

  • Canada: 0.7
  • United States: 2.2

Digestive disease deaths per 100,000:

  • Canada: 17.4
  • United States: 20.5

Infant mortality rate per 1,000 live births

  • Canada: 5.08
  • United States: 6.3

Intestinal diseases death rate

  • Canada: 0.3%
  • United States: 7.3%

Proability of not reaching age 60:

  • Canada: 9.5%
  • United States: 12.8%

Respiratory disease child death rate per 100,000

  • Canada: 0.62
  • United States: 40.43

Heart disease deaths per 100,000:

  • Canada: 94.9
  • United States: 106.5

HIV deaths per million people:

  • Canada: 47.423
  • United States: 48.141

You get the point. If this is “socialized medicine,” sign me the hell up.

 

Here we are now. Entertain us.

Paul Krugman on how our stupid media is really stupid:

What’s in a name?

OK, so let me get this straight. The initial reaction of the cable talking heads was that Obama blew it because he didn’t couch his argument in terms of personal anecdotes, Reagan-style. Then, when it was pointed out that he did, in fact, offer a number of specific examples of people harmed by our current system, the whine became that he didn’t give their names.

Now, it’s true that George Bush liked to give names of people who would benefit from his tax cuts; but Ronald Reagan’s anecdotes — about, say, the Cadillac-driving welfare queen — generally didn’t name names. And there was a good reason for that: with rare exceptions, Reagan’s folksy anecdotes weren’t true.

So what are the talking heads really complaining about? It’s not what Obama didn’t do — it’s what he did, namely talk seriously about policy. How unpresidential of him!

All true, but I think Obama does deserve some of the blame for how his press conference is being received.

The thing about our elite press corps is that everyone knows they’re dumb as rocks and everyone knows they hate, hate, hate thinking about policy. OK, so you’ve got some Ezra Kleins and Jon Cohns who do smart, substantive work on health care. But for the average Jake Tapper or Marc Halperin out there, policy work is BOOO-RIIIIIIING.

My point is that Team Obama should understand this and work it into their strategy. If you want the press corps to pay attention to your arguments you have to make it interesting for them. If that means resorting to cheesy Reaganesque anecdotes, then so be it.

You pitch your policies to the press corps you have, not the press corps you’d like to have.

 

Mad As Hell And Not Gonna Fake It Anymore

You’re Free Republic founder Jim Robinson and you’ve drawn a line in the sand:

If we could get millions of Americans to march on Washington, what would we do?

It cannot be denied that the central government has become destructive of our unalienable rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and our rights to live free. The government is no longer responsive to we the People. They have stretched and shredded the constitution to the point that they have illegally seized for themselves virtually unlimited powers over the citizens and act as if we have no rights and no powers of our own. They are acting without our consent.

Our Founders established that when our government becomes destructive of our rights then it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

We have reached the point where the government’s long train of abuses and usurpations has achieved absolute Despotism, therefore it is our right, it is our duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for our future security.

Therefore, We the People of America choose to exercise our right to throw off and alter the abusive government by peacefully recalling and removing from office the President of the United States, the Vice President of the United States and all U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives effective immediately.

Ah, teh Internets. It wasn’t so long ago that such inchoate rage was scribbled free-hand in composition books for no eyes to recoil from but those of the crime scene investigators. In the past, you might self-publish, but that was costly and brought its own set of perils. A popular alternative was to mail one’s personal madness to media gatekeepers who might be coerced into reprinting it … or might not be. Now, thanks to historical revisionism, we have a state-of-the-art series of tubes that bypasses the New York Times editorial board entirely and plunks your petulant manifesto on the flat-panel displays of like-minded folk across the country, so that you might all rise up in your tens and demand satisfaction from the jug-eared Kenyan interloper who gamed the Constitution with un-American teleprompter-fu to steal a presidential election with a majority of the votes.

Welcome to the Information Age! Where the voices in your head may freely converse with the digital avatars of similar paranoids who reside thousands of miles from your bunker! Where you may openly declare your sworn duty to defend the Founders’ intent from the peaceful and legal transition of power that threatens to destroy their vision of government by, for and of the people … to boldly resist a naked democratic power grab by popularly elected charlatans who use the cherished ideals of our forefathers against us … and at long last, to summon the courage to knock over the Monopoly board of life and stomp off in a tantrum when your political opponents piss all over the rules of the game by following them, and somehow manage to get a hotel on Park Place.

Of course, to make a wingnut omelette, you’ve got to break a few Constitutional eggs … destroy the document in order to save it, etc.:

We hereby repeal the 17th amendment.

The central government has expanded well beyond the limits established for it by the founders and pay for that expansion by directly taxing the people and severely restricting our rights through an enslaving income tax.

We hereby repeal the 16th amendment.

The IRS and all sub departments and agencies are hereby dissolved, disbanded and closed.

All deliciously irrational — but you’re troubled. Your chicken scratch ravings were just peachy for muttering aloud to frightened relatives on the rare occasions that you dragged yourself out of the basement for a family gathering. And your Freepii followers are naturally on board, but you suspect their disembodied replies may just be the product of your fevered imagination anyway. And you wonder, are your words soaring enough to inspire real, live human beings who are not forced to humor you? It’s a quandary, so you summon what last vestiges of socialization you still possess from the days before stranger danger overwhelmed you, and appeal to the pixelated voices that have provided you comfort in the past:

Need lots of help with this document, folks. Please chime in.

There — that wasn’t so hard, was it? And let it be a lesson to all creepy lone-wolf types … Freeper honcho Jim Robinson’s cry for help was met with a tidal wave of constructive criticism for his call-to-arms and the million-wingnut march on Washington he assumes will result from its widespread publication:

‘We need General James Mattoon Scott,’ recommends one Freeper cinephile going by the handle buccaneer81, despite the march being planned for one day in September and not seven in May. It’s also possible that Jack Bauer was not available to lead the protest.

‘The parallels with 1775 are fairly exact (also parallels with Germany in the 30’s as well),’ chimes in the historically minded 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten. True that — back then, they got us with ‘taxation without representation’ and this time around it comes with, but other than that, it’s exactly the same (and the liberal thugs know it, too — we overheard one saying as much at a beer hall putsch just last week).

Others are worried about the dreaded Obama death camps. ‘One of the concerns that I’ve expressed, is getting us all in one place. With the insanity going on, what in your opinion, would prevent this monster from calling in armed troops/thugs and killing us, or at the very least, herding us into prisons where we would never see the light of day again?’ frets Outlaw Woman.

Another Freeper, lula, also expresses some reservations at first, but in the end, well, fuck it: ‘I would love for this to happen, but I’m afraid the unemployment would quadruple since so many work for the government. Then we would have riots and chaos, never the less where do I sign.’

Nervous nellies aside, the dialogue soon turns to strategy. Perhaps Robinson’s nascent movement could benefit from a bit of cosplay and an appeal to the South Asian community, suggests mission9: ‘I think we should try non-violence first. How about a revolutionary fife and drum march of knee sock, powdered wig patriots, followed by a Mohatmed Ghandi stand in, wearing a diaper and carrying a walking stick.’

Pampers or Huggies, whichever’s on sale at the Piggly Wiggly … but a tactical decision will have to be made as to whether the ‘Ghandi’ stand-in should shit himself for effect during the march on Washington.

But as the excitement grows, the conversation takes on a more ominous tone:

“Be ready. The traitors will give you no quarter. Give them none,” warns Enoughofthissocialism.

Later, it is determined that pre-emptive action may be required to counter ‘the traitors.’ Unfortunate, perhaps, but according to Hotlead61, that doesn’t mean such action can’t also be fun — so he helpfully offers to organize a contest for Freepers to murder Robinson’s critics.

The list of said critics certainly won’t include us. For our part, we think Jim Robinson’s manifesto is an instant classic — wouldn’t change a thing. Our favorite bit — the unilateral repeal of Constitutional amendments on the basis of absolutely zero in the way of actual Constitutional process — alone shoots this one to the very top of the wingnut manifesto pantheon, toppling this awful piece of shit.

And we never, ever thought that could happen.

 

Watchdog Barks, Bites Own Butt, Blames The Cat

vadum_zombie

ABOVE: Matthew Vadum


Yeah, I know, posting (again) on NewsBlusters is like shooting dead catfish in a tiny barrel with a shoulder-fired rocket-propelled grenade launcher. So fire me.

But before you do, come take a look with me at Matthew Vadum’s awesomely idiotic posting which he hilariously titles “CNN Aims to Discredit Canadian Mayo Clinic Patient, Flops Spectacularly.” Now, I assume that even in Basic Wingnut Blogging 101 they teach you that it’s not a good idea to accuse someone else of flopping in a post where you don’t just flop but you crash, burn, explode, and incinerate, leaving behind only some skidmarks and a few burnt crumbs from the toasty Quiznos sub (with extra Ranch dressing) that you had for lunch.

So let’s step back and watch Vadum self-destruct:

Patients United Now, which is a project of Americans for Prosperity Foundation, is now running an effective TV ad (available here) opposing President Obama’s socialist healthcare scheme.

It features Holmes, who came to the U.S.-based Mayo Clinic, to have a brain tumor removed. Canada’s dysfunctional government-run healthcare system informed Holmes that she would have to wait for six months to see a specialist. “In six months I would have died,” Holmes says in the spot. The Mayo Clinic where Holmes received successful treatment tells her story at its website.

What really elevates this post from minor fuck-up to total self-immolation is that Vadum actually cites Ms. Holmes’s story at the Mayo website without having even the teensiest clue that it completely contradicts the story that Holmes, Vadum and Patient’s United Now (with its sadly unfortunate acronym) are pushing.

Let’s roll the tape:

Dr. Naresh Patel, neurosurgeon, diagnosed Holmes as having a Rathke’s cleft cyst (RCC). The rare, fluid-filled sac grows near the pituitary gland at the base of the brain and eventually can cause hormone and vision problems.

Cancer? Brain tumor? Certain death in six months? Well, Sadly, No!™ Not one word about any of that on the Mayo website. And, you know, I just bet that The Great Gazoogle can tell us lots of stuff about Rathke’s Cleft Cyst. (Consulting Google is frowned on at NewsBlusters as a frivolous waste of bandwidth when you can just scream “socialism” and be done with it.)

Here’s an interesting fact:

Rathke’s Cleft Cysts are not true tumors or neoplasms; instead they are benign cysts. Rathke’s pouch forms as part of normal development and eventually forms the anterior lobe, pars intermedia and pars tuberalis, of the pituitary gland. This pouch normally closes in fetal development, but a remnant often persists as a cleft that lies between the anterior and posterior lobes of the pituitary gland. Occasionally, this remnant enlarges to form a cyst. RCCs can cause pituitary failure, headaches and in some instances, vision loss.

And an even more stubborn fact:

Mortality associated with RCCs is extremely rare. In a study conducted by Shin and colleagues, the mortality rate was 0%, and the recurrence rate was 19%.2 In the literature, recurrence rates typically are lower, commonly 5-10%; however, Mukherjee co-authors reported a recurrence rate of 33%.3

Shin’s study reported the cumulative rates of recurrence-free survival to be 85% at 5 years, 81% at 10 years, and 81% at 20 years.

So, let’s sum up. Holmes didn’t have a brain tumor She didn’t even have cancer. And her condition wasn’t deadly. The Canadian health system hadn’t given her a death sentence, as she, her American handlers and Vadum are suggesting — which means that Holmes’s story, as dutifully-repeated by the Google-challenged Vadum, is, to use the precise term of art, utter bullshit.

Quelle surprise, as people who, like myself, are French, fags, or both often say.

UPDATE: Mayo took down its page on Shona Homes, no doubt because she had turned herself into a spokes-idiot for the anti-reformists. Thanks to the miracle of the Google cache, we have saved the page as a pdf for posterity and you can find it here.

 

Eeeeewww, Gross!

Shorter Sarah Knoploh:

sarah_knoploh

Sarah Knoploh, News Blusters
Unhappy Humpday

  • Gay male sex is super icky and a movie about two allegedly [air quotes] straight [air quotes] guys who have sex for a porn movie contest is yet another example of the elite homo-loving cocktail party crowd’s oppression of straight males. who, as a result of this film, now will be like totally afraid to leave their homes to go see a movie.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Another reason to give to HCAN

In a previous post, I asked you guys to give money to Health Care for America Now based on some hopey-changey assumption that we can reform our health care system to the point where we at least have a lower infant mortality rate than Cuba.

But then I realized that that’s not why I donated to HCAN today. As a Nixon Democrat — that is, a liberal who is motivated more by spite than by hope — I realized that what spurred me to give $40 to HCAN was that Bill Kristol has his fangs out and is encouraging his comrades kill health reform for another 20 years. Greg Sargent notes that the White House is smartly starting to use this against him:

Asked today why Obama went on the offensive against DeMint’s claim that health care failure could “break” Obama, Gibbs said:

“I think what we want people to understand are a few things. One, we’ve been discussing this for decades. And the familiar mantra of delay has been the message for many of those years to put off the needed and necessary reforms that have to take place in our health care system. You could just as easily have quoted a Republican strategist today who said to go for the kill and asked opponents to resist the temptation to be responsible.”

A lot of people have been wondering when the White House would more aggressively link today’s obstruction to health care reform to the previous, notoriously uncompromising effort to kill it at all costs. This could be the start of such an effort.

Allow me to help them in this effort!

Ladies and gentlemen, this is Bill Kristol:

As if his smug, slimy demeanor weren’t enough reason to dislike him, we must remember the big reason why Kristol opposes health care reform in the first place. In his own words:

[T]he long-term political effects of a successful Clinton health care bill will be even worse–much worse. It will relegitimize middle-class dependence for “security” on government spending and regulation. It will revive the reputation of the party that spends and regulates, the Democrats, as the generous protector of middle-class interests. And it will at the same time strike a punishing blow against Republican claims to defend the middle class by restraining government.

Or put another way, we must oppose health care reform because the public might like it once it’s done.

“But why?” I can hear you asking. “Why would anyone be wicked enough to oppose a policy that would be broadly beneficial to the American middle class?”

The answer is opportunity cost. Bill Kristol is a man whose sole purpose in life is to promote wars, as he has advocated using military force to attack Iran, North Korea, Sudan and even Somali pirates. And if we pass universal coverage in this country, it’ll mean more money for health care means less money for his precious, precious wars.

So! Bill Kristol. 100% evil. And he’s one of the chief forces behind the anti-reform efforts. Are y’all ready to give to HCAN now?