
ABOVE: Msgr. Ross Xavier Pius Douthat, S.J., O.P., O.F.M., S.S.J., Th.D+
Like the rest of you I’ve been eagerly anticipating for Ross Douthat — our favorite Chunky Reese Witherspoon Lothario manqué — to enlighten us on Weinergate— not just because I’m interested to hear what Jesus and the Pope think about twexting, but also because Douthat can’t write about genitalia without getting all flustered. What better way, then, to start off the work week, huh?
In every time and place, people have associated new technologies with moral decline. “Men think that it is essential that the Nation have commerce,” Henry David Thoreau griped in 1854, “and export ice, and talk through a telegraph, and ride thirty miles an hour.
Oh dear. Ross is about to tell us that at least you couldn’t send pictures of your dick by telegraph.
Sometimes, though, the pessimists are right to worry. Technology really does affect character. … In the sad case of Representative Anthony Weiner’s virtual adultery, the Internet era’s defining vice has been thrown into sharp relief. It isn’t lust or smut or infidelity, though online life encourages all three. It’s a desperate, adolescent narcissism.
There is, of course, no desperate, adolescent narcissism involved in Ross’s thinking that the readers of the New York Times are in the least interested in what a flabby and pious moralist like Ross thinks about teh Internetz and cock shots.
The rituals of social media, it seems, make status-seekers and exhibitionists of us all.
Presumably Ross is exempting himself from the dreadful spiritual predations of Twitter and Facebook because we can be sure that not only hasn’t Ross turned his iPhone onto his own private parts but also that he has refused to even look down there for almost thirty years. (Well, think about it, would you want to look “down there” if you were Ross?)
At 46, Weiner isn’t technically a member of Generation Facebook, but he’s clearly a well-habituated creature of the online social world. The fact that he used the Internet’s freedoms to violate his marriage vows isn’t particularly noteworthy.
For those who may not be keeping up on the latest goings on in Ross’s church, the Pope has recently revised the marriage vows to read:
I, ____, take you, ____, to be my (husband/wife). I promise to be true to you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health, and without sending pictures of my genitalia to anyone else or mentioning my state of sexual arousal over Twitter or Facebook except unto you.
Ross continues:
In all the tweets and transcripts that have leaked to date, there’s no sign that Weiner was particularly interested in the women he communicated with — not as human beings, certainly, but not really even as lust objects either. His “partners” existed less to titillate him than to hold up mirrors to his own vanity: whether the congressman was tweeting photos of his upper body or bragging about what lurked below, his focus was always squarely on himself.
This is rich. Ross, who once popped a soft-on when told a potential conquest was on the pill, is lecturing Weiner about how to treat women. Let’s take a trip down memory lane into one of the, er, damper and squishier corners of Ross’s autobiographical musings:
One successful foray ended on the guest bed of a high school friend’s parents, with a girl who resembled a chunkier Reese Witherspoon drunkenly masticating my neck and cheeks. It had taken some time to reach this point–“Do most Harvard guys take so long to get what they want?” she had asked, pushing her tongue into my mouth. I wasn’t sure what to say, but then I wasn’t sure this was what I wanted. My throat was dry from too much vodka, and her breasts, spilling out of pink pajamas, threatened my ability to. I was supposed to be excited, but I was bored and somewhat disgusted with myself, with her, with the whole business… and then whatever residual enthusiasm I felt for the venture dissipated, with shocking speed, as she nibbled at my ear and whispered–“You know, I’m on the pill…”
Finally, if you were wondering what got Ross all spun up to devote so much time to Weiner’s tweets (other than, of course, Weiner’s membership in the Democratic party), you’re about to find out.
It’s the pecs.
In this sense, his tweeted chest shots are more telling than the explicitly pornographic photos that followed. There was a time when fame and influence were supposed to liberate men from such adolescent insecurity. When Henry Kissinger boasted about power being the ultimate aphrodisiac, the whole point was that he didn’t have to worry about his pecs and glutes while, say, wooing the former Bond girl Jill St. John.
In a perfect world, you see, neck-bearded albinos with flabby tits and squishy hard-ons are the ones who really deserve to get the girls, not because of their manly, gym-toned physical appearance but because they write for the New York Times. At least as long as the girls aren’t on the pill.