Can You Imagine The Uproar If James Taylor Played ‘Fire and Rain’?

ABOVE: La bruja loca no quiere el Snotcho.


Honk, snort, moo! It’s Malkin, and guess what? She’s upset about something today.

Michelle Malkin:
Heckuva job, Louie and Barry!

[…]

Using military resources for a cheap photo-op. Scaring the pants off the public. Exploiting 9/11 imagery for self-aggrandizement. Keeping secrets and causing mass panic.

Um, can you imagine if a GOP administration did this?

Trying, ungh…

Can you imagine?!

I know! We’ll use our imagi-na-tion.


Above: Imagi-na-tion!


Above: Using military resources for a cheap photo-op


Above: Scaring the pants off the public


Above: Exploiting 9/11 imagery for self-aggrandizement


Above: Keeping secrets


Above: Well, we were hysterical, anyway.

 

Confession

I’m getting tempted to register as a Republican simply because I feel sorry for them.

Also, we do need two functioning parties in this country in order for our democracy to remain somewhat successful, and I’d like to help move the GOP at least marginally more toward the center so the next time they’re elected they don’t start performing resurrection rituals on Terri Schiavo.

Basically, what I’m saying is this country would be vastly better off if both major political parties ignored the GOP base. Who’s with me?

 

Oh Whew, ‘Greed’ — We Thought He Meant The Band

Ding-dong. Hello? There’s nobody here, but what’s this thumbtacked to the tree?

John Hinderaker, Powerline:
Decade of Greed

The Congressional Republicans have produced some good charts that show what has happened to the country’s fiscal health since the Democrats took control of Congress and, worse yet, what they themselves project over the coming years. This one charges the Democrats with irresponsibility:

Fair enough. But why is it that the public sector is never charged with greed? What we see in this chart is, in fact, the insatiable hunger for money and power that characterizes Washington Democrats.1 Now that they are in control of both the legislative and executive branches, the Democrats’ greed is unchecked. You can see the result.

Well, they say a picture is worth a thousand words. How is it that we never before realized the rapacity of these liberal plundocrats? See if we trust them again, because there is one word for this, and that is ‘tax and spend.’ Good day.

Ding-dong. Hello? What’s this thumbtacked to the tree?

We, you know, await with ongoing good cheer the correction that Hinderaker will never make. For if done in good faith, one such correction would force another, thus forcing another, causing in short order a mea-culpalanche, a rending of garments and a growing and subsequent tearing of beards that could only end with Powerline erased in its totality from the Internet and its server dropped into one of those lakes they have ten thousand of, apparently, out there in Minnesota.

It could be replaced, as we often imagine, with a large, primary-colored message in MS Comic Sans saying ME GO BAFWOOM, over a stick-figure drawing of Hindy with his hair standing up in penciled spicules, making the sine-mouthed expression of the physically confounded. Or else the following:

WELCOME TO OWERLINE
Notice there is no “P” in it!
Please keep it that way!
-The M’g’m’t’t

Or we’ll think of something else; you know how it OMG ARLEN SPECTER TEH WHAT, NOW?

[picks up remote and turns on the Internet]


1 Hinderaker’s position on the hunger for money depends very much on whether the hungerer is a good-hooray-person or a bad-hiss-person.

Tintin adds: There’s some additional tomfoolery with this graph. The data points have been moved to fit on the line, rather than the line being drawn to fit the data points. If you graph the line with equal units for each axis, well, surprise, surprise, the slope when the nice Republicans were in charge gets steeper. And the slope for when the evil Democrats will be wrecking the economy decreases rather than increases over time.

pelosi_graph

 

Mr. Muir, Adobe Called. They Want Illustrator® Back.

Just when you thought Big Hollywood couldn’t be any more preposterous, along comes Chris Muir with one of his comics which, as always, needed to be fixed:

gay_by_gay_by_muir

 

Swinebusters Bust The Swinulus

 

Moe Lane, RedState:
Schumer video bragging about cutting pandemic fund surfaces.

  • Not only did Chuck Schumer cut flu finding by saying approvingly that flu finding was cut, but it was cut in a pathetic attempt to appease us — which failed because we tricked him! Eat blame, loser. Malkin has more.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Michelle Malkin:
Schumer opposed flu pandemic funding in stimulus, too, you morons

  • The unhinged liberals are attacking Republicans for cutting flu funding! Schumer! Him! Him! Blame! He! Schumer! Him! Simultaneously, he loves pork. Loves pork! Snarl! Aroo! I drag feces through his flesh with my teeth! Shriek! Squeal!

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Allahpundit, HotAir:
Left: Republicans love swine flu or something

  • Boss Malkin is like whatever, and I’m like, fine, slow news day, but I thought Republicans were supposed to take threats too seriously, because now we’re supposedly in trouble for what, cutting spending? I guess that’s where bipartisanship gets us, huh? SUCK IT, COLLINS! BLAR HAR HAR!

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Michelle Malkin:
Of course: Swine flu is all the evil GOP’s fault!

  • Howl! Gurgle! Partisan Democrats are unhingedly attacking us, when all we did was beat [clang] to death with a fireplace [clang] poker, like YOU with the [clang] to CRACK YOUR [clang] HEAD AND STOMP [clang] EYEBALLS [clang, stomp-stomp crash] KILL DOG [yipe! yipe! clang!] BURN WITH GASOLINE [foosh! yipe! yipe!] EVERYTHING BURNING, BURNING, YODEL-AY-HEE-HOO!1

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Don Surber, Charlotte (WV) Daily Mail:
Why they blame Republicans for the swine flu

  • Looks like Obama’s got egg on his face! He’s desperate to blame us for cutting flu funding while we’ve been fooling him by tanking his health nominees. Guess he should’ve done something besides let us thwart him, huh? Welcome MichelleMalkin.com readers!

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™



1 This is not a faithful Shorter, but we’re curious as to how funny it would be if every Malkin appearance had her screaming nonsense, breaking things, and attacking people. It seems like the kind of thing that would be funny once or twice, then not funny the next three or four times, but then funny again for infinity times.

Also, while Collins and Schumer have been shuttlecocked back and forth as symbols of Republican and Democratic perfidy, neither seems to have done anything especially blameworthy, or to be very important to the swine-flu story as it’s developing. That said, it seems likely that the fault for whatever happens will somehow rest with conservatives, and will reflect shame upon conservatism as an ideology. Because why would things stop doing that all of a sudden?

 

Pericles Shrugged

Victor Davis Hanson, NRO:
Damnation of Memory: Persecuting his predecessors, Obama would establish a poisonous precedent.

  • When a party enters power and attempts to investigate…excuse me, let me put these goalposts over here, thank you.
  • Um, when a party won’t even play fair by conducting its baseless investigations while its adversaries are in power, then how can they expect…excuse me, one moment, let me slide them over this way, sorry, thanks.
  • So. Did these people try to prosecute their rivals after their rivals did not break laws? No? Well in that case, how would you like it if we prosecuted Obama for killing two Somali pirates without reading them their Miranda rights? Because it…oh, hang on.
  • It was, ooh, bad enough with the infamous political lynching of Scooter Libby in the absence of any crime, but America does not erase purged officials from its photographs like Stalin did, because that’s how the U.N. will get you! Yes! They will smell blood like sharks, and…
  • Alas! Alas, society will be weakened by our endless cycle of revenge against you. Heh-heh. Because we have no principles — I mean because you don’t, so why should we have any? Because you made us not have any, like how all of you supported the war in Iraq until the insurgency began, and then you made up some crazy lie about “ooh, it was all Bush’s idea,” and how there were no quote-unquote “WMDs,” because…aw crap, wait.
  • Because in 2003, Bush had saved America from terror. Yes. And then you partisan streetfighters were feeling pretty good, huh? Because I guess then you felt pretty big, huh? Because then you started to attack your deliverer for quote-unquote “wiretaps” and so-called “torture” ooh, ooh, rrr! That’s what you thought you’d do. Snorgle-horgle-haggle-hoob…ah, excuse me, I’ll be back in one second, thanks.
  • Hi, thanks, and that’s…and that’s why you’ll be all “ho-hum” when the terrorists come back and attack and kill, unless, no wait.
  • You’ll hate Obama then, when the terrorists come back. Oh boy will you hate Obama. And you’ll want to prosecute him then, ha ha! That’s what you’ll want to do. Prosecute Obama! Opposite!
  • Not so sure of yourselves now, huh? It’s like I’ve been saying all along, isn’t it? Huh? Isn’t it? Oh, I feel the frost of winter. [smiles thinly, sweeps cloak about himself in a grandiose flourish, exits as though on treads to a single note on a kettle drum]


‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

They Divided The Country By IQ, And We Got The Bigger Half


Above: “Thith liberal here ith up to thomething.”

Action Alert from the Sarah Palin List:
“Rahm Emanuel & Co. seizing an opportunity with the supposed swine flu crisis?”

  • I have been inundated with emails: Are Obama and Rahm Emanuel engineering a swine-flu “crisis” to save the Sebelius nomination? I have to wonder. Call your Senators NOW.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Can You Imagine The Outcry If Popeye Said TOOT TOOT?

rob_port_klo

ABOVE: The baseball cap is not the only thing
bass-ackwards about Rob Port


…And so we return to the other side of the right’s ingenious and growingly hysterical arguments in favor of governmental torture. For as conservatives defend the President’s authority to violate the Constitution at will, they spend much of the rest of the time in a euphoria of persecution, growingly hysterical over the other President and his ability to do things without even asking anybody, through the expedient of winning a single election. It doesn’t help matters that he is creating a fascist police state of communist Hitler outrage, and plotting to put them all in prison camps.

How do they resolve this seeming contradiction? Oh, you know.

Rob Port, Say Anything:
Obama Wants To Remove Your Right To A Lawyer During Police Interrogations

In 1986, with the Michigan vs. Jackson decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the police cannot interrogate you without your lawyer present unless you give them your consent. Obama wants to change that.

Hey, it’s the Torygraph, heh-heh, I mean Telegraph. Also on tap there this week: why Britain must return to Thatcherism, a report on the disastrous Obama presidency, something on the global-warming hoax, a defense of free markets, a demand for lower taxes on the wealthy… They seem to have a certain thing going. Their man Conrad Black left under a bit of a cloud.

The Michigan vs Jackson ruling in 1986 established that, if a defendants have a lawyer or have asked for one to be present, police may not interview them until the lawyer is present.

Any such questioning cannot be used in court even if the suspect agrees to waive his right to a lawyer because he would have made that decision without legal counsel, said the Supreme Court.

However, in a current case that seeks to change the law, the US Justice Department argues that the existing rule is unnecessary and outdated.

Can you sense something great coming? I’m totally sensing something amazing on the way.

The sixth amendment of the US constitution protects the right of criminal suspects to be “represented by counsel”, but the Obama regime argues that this merely means to “protect the adversary process” in a criminal trial.

Ooh, ‘regime.’ Here it comes.

The Justice Department, in a brief signed by Elena Kagan, the solicitor general, said the 1986 decision “serves no real purpose” and offers only “meagre benefits”.

Here comes the payoff…

First, imagine if a Republican administration were doing this. Then imagine what the media’s reaction would be.

 
😮
 

Don’t expect that same reaction for Obama. Because he’s a liberal, he’s held to a different standard.

 

 
As though to vouch for the fact that we haven’t just drunk too much root beer and gotten all fizzy, here comes Cap’n Ed:

Obama to end representation in interrogations?

[…]

Can you imagine what the outcry over this would have been had President John McCain, or for that matter President George W. Bush, had tried this? Newspapers around the nation would have decried his assault on civil liberties. PFAW and the ACLU would have staged rallies in every American city, and they would have called Bush, McCain, or any other Republican a fascist for denying legal counsel to people under police questioning. We’d have an endless line of appearances on television news programs from people who got coerced into false confessions after having been denied counsel.

 
:@
 
 
O wau. Zom-guh. Witf!?

You know, it’s not enough for a conservative merely to be stupid and angry, because if that alone were satisfying to them, they could stand in the bathroom yelling “DER!” all day barely bothering anybody. No, we suspect that Ed must also be trying to misrepresent this story in order to help others be stupid and angry — to cause a stupelanche, a failcano.

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Oh, So They Have Internet On Computers Now!

homer_hinderaker_4

Shorter John Hinderaker, Powerlieblog1
What’s Next? Beavis and Butthead?

  • Even though I have never seen one single episode of The Simpsons, the Post Office’s issuance of stamps depicting the characters on that show is final and conclusive proof that Barack Obama is flushing this country down the toilet. We should have more George Washington and Ronald Reagan stamps. Not Simpson stamps, even if that show is on Fox. Only socialists and Europeans would issue stamps that commemorate a cartoon show. What next? Beavis and Butthead? South Park?? The Fucking Flintstones??? Mickey Fucking Mouse????!! DONALD MOTHERFUCKING DUCK??????!!!! … And maybe, just once, someone will call me “Sir” without adding “You’re making a scene.”

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


1As Gavin is tampering with the sacrosanct format of the Sadly, No! shorter, there is now no reason that a shorter can’t be longer than the post that it is shortening.
 

He Seems To Know That Speech Well Enough

Marc Thiessen, The Corner:1
The West Coast Plot: An “Inconvenient Truth”

  • Ridiculous are my critics and proven are my claims, for the CIA officially says2 that a plot to fly an airliner into L.A.’s Library Tower3 was foiled through the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.4 Boo-yah!5

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


Notes:

1 Thiessen, formerly chief speechwriter for George W. Bush, is temporarily notorious for this Washington Post op-ed, and is lately engaged in a battle of wits with Slate’s Timothy Noah. Andrew Sullivan stands with Noah, while Crazy Andy McCarthy is ook-ooking on Thiessen’s side, explaining how Saddam Hussein was in league with Al Qaeda, and occasioning relief by not dragging Obama’s birth certificate into it.

2 A 2005 memo from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel to the chief CIA counsel says that the CIA had told them this. (The .PDF is the second from the top.)

3 According to the Bush administration, this alleged plot was foiled in 2002.

4 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan on March 1, 2003.

5 Thiessen explains how this is possible:

  • George Bush said so in speeches, specifically “the most carefully vetted speech in presidential history,” i.e. the most carefully parsed speech probably in the Bush presidency, which Thiessen was presumably in on. Appointees signed off on this speech with CYA memos, specifically Honest John Negroponte, whose legal exposure in the matter of interrogations is palpable. Therefore, no matter what the intelligence community says now, their real opinion is faithfully reproduced in this world-historical Bush speech, no backs, infinity.
  • A timeline of incidents from the same speech, mostly dubious, agrees with what Bush said in that speech.
  • An interested party and possible subject of investigation, former CIA director Michael Hayden, cites the same speech on an April 19 FOX News interview, and adds some sourceless claims that can’t be checked.
  • Thiessen makes a few more unverifiable claims (i.e. “according to the intelligence community”), adding, “These are just a few of the plots that were broken up because of information gained from CIA interrogations.” That means Thiessen knows about others but isn’t telling!

Our recommendation, of course, is waterboarding. Also, we could ask Thiessen if that practice yields reliable information, and keep doing it until he says no.

We await Mr. Noah’s rebuttal with mustard and relish.