Lord Andrew Throckmorton Farthington Stuttaford, the Seventh Duke of West Brixtonshire, who blogs at America’s Shittiest Website™ on climate issues thanks to the munificence of the Exxon-Mobil corporation and other purveyors of fine fossil fuels, shares with his dozen or so readers today a vile plot by the Ecuadorians to create a mandatory Earth Mother/Goddess religion that the U.N. will impose on the entire world as some sort of Green sharia law. The seeds of this plot were sown in the 2008 Ecuadorian constitution:
[H]ere, via Religion Dispatches, is a piece that discusses the ‘rights’ of the Earth, the eco-system and, well, just about everything. Yes, it’s an absurd premise, and one for which the writer clearly has some sympathy, but this extract from the new (2008) Ecuadorian constitution is still worth noting:
Nature or Pachamama, where life is reproduced and exists, has the right to exist, persist, maintain itself and regenerate its own vital cycles, structure, functions, and its evolutionary processes. Any person, people, community, or nationality, may demand the observance of the rights of the natural environment before public bodies.
This somewhat sinister drivel is [sic] presumably largely reflects the influence of the work of Ecuador’s somewhat sinister president Morales, the man who, in 2009, was declared by the president of the United Nations General Assembly, one Rev. Miguel D’Escoto Brockmann, to be a “World Hero of Mother Earth”.
Typical of the high-caliber blogging at America’s Shittiest Website™ is Lord Stuttaford’s notion that Evo Morales is the President of Ecuador. Sadly, No! Evo Morales is the President of, er, Bolivia, a country that doesn’t even border Ecuador and is more than a thousand miles away. Of course, I suppose to Stuttaford this is just a minor detail since both countries are populated by tiny little garlic-munching pepper-popping Spanish-speaking brown people.
Somehow or other, Lord Stuttaford discovered his error and rather than admit error and remove the reference to Morales from the post, he doubled down and continued to blame the provision in the Ecuadorian Constitution on the Bolivian President:
This somewhat sinister drivel
is presumably largelypresumably partly reflects the influence of the work of Bolivia’s somewhat sinister president Morales …
For those of you who do not speak fluent wingnut, “presumably” means that there is not a shred of evidence for Morales’s involvement in the Ecuadorian constitution other than that Lord Stuttaford doesn’t like Morales or the provision in question so the two things must necessarily be connected. Lord Stuttaford is presumably partly responsible himself for The Learning Channel, pumpkin-pie flavored coffee drinks, and Dothan, Alabama.










