Posted on March 24th, 2011 by D. Aristophanes
Renew America’s Bryan Fischer has made the shocking discovery that the US Constitution’s ballyhooed First Amendment doesn’t protect the ‘right’ of Muslims to practice their religion:
Islam and the First Amendment: privileges but not rights
By Bryan Fischer
The First Amendment was written by the Founders to protect the free exercise of Christianity. They were making no effort to give special protections to Islam. Quite the contrary.
A bold statement and it probably behooves us to look at the actual text of the First Amendment to see if Fischer’s on to something:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Holy Hannah, he’s right! We don’t see anything about ‘Islam’ in there, either. Whereas the part that specifically names ‘Christianity’ is right there between the lines!
Meanwhile, there’s nothing in the First Amendment that says the PRESIDENT can’t make a law ‘respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof’, even if Congress can’t. Not that the stealth Muslim in the White House would ever make a law prohibiting Islam — yeah, right!
Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam. Islam is entitled only to the religious liberty we extend to it out of courtesy. While there certainly ought to be a presumption of religious liberty for non-Christian religious traditions in America, the Founders were not writing a suicide pact when they wrote the First Amendment.
Ironically, suicide pacts are themselves protected under the First Amendment. Or are they? It’s a question for the lawyers, but we’re guessing that Judas Priest-inspired suicide pacts are protected under the Constitution but Cat Stevens ones are not. To quote the great Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter, ‘If you want to sing out, shut the fuck up, raghead! PS durka durka bitchez!’
(Historical sidenote: If you play the First Amendment backwards you hear this.)
Our government has no obligation to allow a treasonous ideology to receive special protections in America …
True, but making a big fuss about Todd Palin’s past political affiliations is sort of tacky, right?
… but this is exactly what the Democrats are trying to do right now with Islam.
Oh, right. Forgot to stay on message for a second.
From a constitutional point of view, Muslims have no First Amendment right to build mosques in America.
Well, duh. Everybody knows that the First Amendment is trumped by the Ground Zero Amendment!
They have that privilege at the moment, but it is a privilege that can be revoked if, as is in fact the case, Islam is a totalitarian ideology dedicated to the destruction of the United States.
And having the state ban certain types of religious speech is so totally not totalitarian! I’d say we’ve reached peak wingnut, but I’m still holding out for the ‘Obama: Member Of An Al-Qaeda Sleeper Cell?’ headline on WorldNetDaily.