Posted on June 2nd, 2005 by Gavin M.
Dear Jesse at Pandagon,
You wrote: “Lord Jesus, I know we don’t talk much, but I’m just gonna flat-out ask you: the overseer of all creation, and you make dumbasses like this? What’s up with that shit?”
As experts in the field of right-wing dumbasses, we should like to say that you’re merely skimming the top of the barrel. Dig down, deep down, and it is splendid what one finds.
For instance, in the piece you linked, in which Publius Pundit (a new friend for us! yay!) does zany Google searches trying to demonstrate that the whole media in the entire world blames the US for spurious human rights abuses, while turning a blind eye to flagrant abuses elsewhere, we find the Googling of the peanut gallery.
For instance, ‘thebronze’ gives the following iron smackdown:
Last, but not least:
human rights abuses north korea – 10
That pretty much says it all?
Comment by thebronze ? 6/1/2005 @ 11:34 pm
Pwnz3r3d!
But let’s do that search again just to check.
Results 1 – 10 of about 397,000 for human rights abuses north korea. (0.09 seconds)
Yup, he’s right: Out of about 397,000 pages on the Internet, only ten mention human rights abuses in North Korea.
(But now there are twelve, counting his comment and this page!)
This must be from a smaller Internet, but it comprises an astounding 50% of all total Web pages.
Anyway, this new ‘Googling’ pastime on the computer sure has a lot of bugs in it, but we think it can be worked out soon.
Best,
Dwarf Henchman #2 at S,N!
==
Update: the Apostropher notes that this, like Publius’s original searches, may have been on Google News, not Google Web. If so, we have made a mistake, and we instead get the following result:
Results 1 – 10 of about 109 for human rights abuses north korea. (0.05 seconds)
So there’s that ’10’ again, but with a funny ‘109’ after it. Was his number merely 1000% wrong, instead of nearly 4,000,000%? Our thought is that anyone unable to read a Google result would also be stymied by the confusing Google Web/Google News distinction, and would just pound out a search on the first thing that said ‘Google’ on it.
But it’s ten hits either way, although the Internet keeps expanding and contracting or something, and we say again that he’s absolutely right: This proves the treasonous menace of the liberal media.