Posted on June 10th, 2005 by Brad
Guys- I’m not normally self-righteous (like I said, I don’t have a lotta standards), but when you disagree with someone, there is no need to get personal. Comments like this are a case in point:
Well, that means she’s either really really horribly old, a slut, or a major cock tease. All in all a thoroughly unattractive individual, and as she is unattractive, I do not wish to know her.
When you take an argument and turn it into an attack on someone’s personal life (about which you know nothing, I might add), you are basically conceding that you cannot argue with them on an intellectual level. And yes, I know that “the other person did it too,” but that’s no excuse: when you react emotionally and attack someone personally, you’ve lost the argument (OK, so it’s OK to joke about Ben Shaprio’s creepy obsession with porn, but he’s writing a whole goddamn book about it).
Just because someone’s opinions are wingnutty, that doesn’t necessarily make them a terrible person. My grandmother was one of the biggest wingnuts around (she voted for Pat Buchanan ferchrissake), but she was still a terrific grandma.
OK, all done now. And to the person who made the above comment- I’m not mad at you, but please think before you post.
CLARIFICATION: I’ve got no problem with being nasty, or even name-calling every now and then. My problem was that the whole damn thread had degenerated into nothing but “You’re an ass-fuck!” “You’re a cum guzzling ass-fuck monster twat!”
And let’s face it, folks, there’s only room for one cum-guzzling ass-fuck monster twat on this blog, and his name is Seb.
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Brad
The Editors have been going crazy with kitten pictures this week, so I figured Sadly, No! could use some kitten pics of its own.
But our kittens aren’t the snuggly, fuzzy creatures the Editors are so enamored with. No, our kittens are battle-scarred hell-beasts that will demolish the Editors’ beloved critters!!!
Now attack, yon kitties, attack!!!!1!!
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Gavin M.
We’re the Cruel Site of the Day.
www.cruel.com
We’re not cruel! Brad just said to…
Jeez.
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Brad
I don’t have many standards, but the nastiness in the comments section has gotten to be way too much.
Por favor, if you’re going to make fun of someone, make fun of what they write or their ideas (or their crappy recipes), but not them personally. And yes, that means you shouldn’t call someone “white trash,” no matter how much you disagree with them.
Thank you.
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Gavin M.
So I finally typed in www.sadlyno.com into my browser and checked out just what they were doing to create this raucus with emails and guestbook sigs flooding my inbox and site. Ha! Apparently after months of me not really writing anything; they were bored and started attacking my recipes. Brilliant.
Brad, do you want this one? I’m sort of having a laughing problem — I can’t open Firefox without ending up on the floor wheezing……….
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Brad
Just for kicks, I’ve decided to recap the highlights from this week’s Pastor Swank columns in haiku form:
Catholic Ordained Females = Carnal Rebellion (Part I):
Rebellious females,
Ordained carnal rebellion,
Upstarts first-order.
Catholic Ordained Females= Carnal Rebellion (Part II):
John Kerry and spouse
Endorse killing womb babies
Enough already.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Gavin M.
From a nameless blog that we forget where it was (aaah-[sondra k]-CHOO!) and certainly cannot link to.
**for extra-added bonus….
my Gadsden tattoo was called “some biker thing” on the same Oui Todd blog the above quote came from! A BIKER THING?????????? HAAAAAAAAAA…I think some one needs to brush up a bit on their American History!
From comments:
oh, yeah — that from someone who would piss himself if a real biker so much as looked at him. bahahahahahaha — real inside knowledge, there “normie”
Posted by Claire at June 9, 2005 10:10 AM
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Gavin M.
test test test
jhg jhg jhg
12121212
[Heh heh. Since I’m ‘Trunkrocket,’ now Brad has to be ‘The Big Heinie.’]
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Brad
You gotta give him credit for this one:
But there never seems to be any sanction imposed on left-wing editorial cartoonists who misrepresent facts.
It’s funny, I could say the same thing about Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter, who are basically cartoons too (to say nothing of the wingnuttery espoused daily by Mallard Fillmore).
Of course, I’m not fascist enough to say that people who “misrepresent facts” while writing/drawing an editorial should face “sanctions”- then I wouldn’t have anything to blog about.
Posted on June 9th, 2005 by Gavin M.
While looking at stats to watch all the traffic being sucked out of poor Sondra K.’s blog, we noticed that rarest of things: a Google query that doesn’t mention ‘teens,’ ‘spanking,’ or people’s body parts.
http://www.google.com/search?what does an ornithologist study
Birds! (He crowed.)
It’s kind of funny to think of someone doing a search for ‘what does an ornithhologist study,’ and two minutes later the site he’s on gleefully posts ‘Birds!’ in response — but the querier never sees it because he’s back clicking through Google.
Well, we’re totally here when you need us.
Ok, wait: How are stats at Sondra K.’s wingnut blog? (looking) Yow.
Detail Referring URL
1 https://sadlyno.com/
2 https://sadlyno.com/
3 https://sadlyno.com/
4 unknown
5 https://sadlyno.com/
Looks like we haven’t sucked it quite dry yet. That lemon’s got some squeezing left in it.