And I May Schlafly Write It Now, And You May Schlafly Read

An exciting special offer showed up in my mailbox today, letting me know that if I subscribed to Human Events for a year, I would get Ann Coulter’s new book for free. This is definitely the most inviting deal I’ve seen since I learned that if I got a long, painful case of stomach cancer, I could also get a debilitating stroke at no extra charge.

It’s awfully tempting. Without Human Events, I wouldn’t be able to read brilliant essays by cutting-edge conservative intellectuals like, oh, say…Phyllis Schlafly.

stopera2.png“Advice to College Students: Don’t Major in English”, reads the headline, and for once, it seems like Phyllis is making sense. Unfortunately, however, the follow-up text doesn’t focus on how our hyper-capitalist society, degraded by decades of absorbing G.O.P. values, no longer esteems the arts, so if you major in English you will end up working at Der Wienerschnitzel. Nor does it warn that, should you major in English, you run a significant risk of growing up to be Mary Grabar. No, instead, Phyllis focuses on the most dreadful prospect of all: majoring in English will turn you into a mass-murdering Communist.

The bad news is that Shakespeare has disappeared from required courses in English departments at more than three-fourths of the top 25 U.S. universities

“Prove,” a good English teacher would note in the margins of Phyllis’ paper, were she still in academia rather than working in a field where one is rewarded for intellectual laziness.

When I visit college campuses, students for years have been telling me that the English departments are the most radicalized of all departments, more so than sociology, psychology, anthropology, or even women’s studies.

Which students? The ones in the English programs? Where? Give examples. Oh, wait, I forgot! It’s Phyllis Schlafly. For “give examples,” read “engage in baseless alarmism.”

That’s why it was no surprise that Cho Seung-Hui, the murderer of 32 students and teachers at Virginia Tech, was an English major.

To recap: The radicalization of college English departments are why it is to be expected that English majors become mass murderers. Phyllis is 83 years old, of course, and may not be familiar with Google or Wikipedia, so she would have no way of knowing that of all the mass murderers in the last 150 years, the number of them who were English majors, English teachers, or English professors stands at a whopping. . .well, one. Cho Seung-Hui is the sole English major in the whole bloody bunch. Avid churchgoers? Lots of them. Menial laborers? Oh, you bet. High school dropouts aplenty. And military veterans? Whoo-doggie! Oodles of those guys on the list. I don’t think Phyllis is fixing to write a column where she says it’s “no surprise” that a mass murderer was in the armed forces, though.

Phyllis’ inability to work the internetting machine may also explain her somewhat deceptive claim that “Shakespeare has disappeared from required courses”. This doesn’t mean that Shakespeare is no longer required — only that it’s been dropped as a requirement in some courses — nor does it mean Shakespeare isn’t taught in colleges, though she’s clearly happy if you walk away with both those assumptions. Funnier, though, is her towering terror of the presence of un-American values even in the classics:

When the classics are assigned, they are victims of the academic fad called deconstructionism.

Derrida had already pretty well established the tenets of deconstructionism (and was already beginning to repudiate them) by 1967, and he was working off of a foundation put down by Heidegger in the 1930s. So, as fads go, this one’s pretty persistent.

That means: pay no mind to what the author wrote or meant; deconstruct him and construct your own interpretation, as in a Vanderbilt University course called “Shakespearean Sexuality,” or “Chaucer: Gender and Genre” at Hamilton College.

Are you people paying attention? Even as we speak, Communist academics are going around, willy-nilly, claiming that there are sexual elements in the works of William Shakespeare! Phyllis wants Shakespeare taught in our colleges, but it’s important that he’s taught the right way, without anything yucky included.

The facts about what universities are teaching English majors were exposed this year by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni. English majors are offered a potpourri of worthless courses.

Well, if the American Council of Trustees and Alumni said it, it must be true! An unimpeachably honest lot, they, with a board consisting of such unbiased truth-seekers as Bill Bennett, Georgie Anne Geyer, Irving Kristol, Marty Peretz, and a senior VP of Texaco.

Some English department courses are really sociology or politics.

Which, of course, have nothing to do with literature.

Shakespeare, Chaucer and Milton have been replaced by living authors who toe the line of multicultural political correctness, i.e., view everything through the lens of race, gender and class based on the assumption that America is a discriminatory and unjust racist and patriarchal society. The only good news is that students seldom read books any more and use Cliffs Notes for books they might be assigned.

It takes a brave, brave woman to write an article in which she claims that it’s a positive development that students don’t read books anymore. But Phyllis Schlafly has always been a brave, crazy brave woman.

 

They Won’t Let Him Own Black People Anymore, Either

Morality is a complex, nuanced, occasionally confusing issue. That’s why, when things that appear to be difficult moral decisions need to be made, I like to go to an authoritative source.

colsonclown2.pngLike, for instance, convicted felon and Watergate conspirator Chuck Colson.

Imagine you own a small business—let’s say a donut shop—and you have an employee who is late for work everyday and is rude to customers. When you fire him, he claims it is really because he is gay—and sues.

Or imagine you run a daycare center in your church basement. One day a homosexual applies for a job. When you turn him down, he says you broke the law.

Ooh, it’s the “let’s imagine” game! I love this one. Let’s imagine that an individual involved in the single worst violation of America’s faith in its government, bar none,* (who then served Federal time for his crimes and was also disbarred) thinks that he can ever again open his mouth about how this country ought to be governed without the rest of the world collectively laughing at him and giving him the Nelson Muntz salute.

As you can see, Chucky’s got his panties in a wad over the proposed ENDA legislation, which basically makes it a crime to fire someone because they’re LGBT. Poor Chucky is worried that this will interfere with his God-given right to treat people he doesn’t like as poorly as humanly possible – because it’s what Jesus would do.

Under intense goading from the gay-rights lobby, the House of Representatives is poised to vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, called ENDA. This legislation would add “sexual orientation” to civil rights law. If passed, ENDA would cut deeply into the religious rights and freedoms of all Americans.

For example, an employer with a moral or religious belief opposed to homosexuality or bisexuality would be forced to give up those rights the moment he arrives at his office. No business would be allowed to refuse to hire a homosexual for any reason. Fire a person because of incompetence—he would say it’s because he is gay, or just even perceived to be gay.

The nerve of some people! Can you imagine? Next thing you know, the government is going to start forcing people whose sincerely held moral or religious beliefs say that black people and white people should not utilize the same services to start integrating their businesses! This is outrageous!

Hey, Chuck……my sincerely held religious beliefs require me to deny any and all services to religious nutjobs who pass off their bigotry as religion. Unless, of course, the nutjobs in question agree to wear a full clown costume – including the nose – before they enter my place of business. And, while my religion is small now, I’m pretty sure that just by writing this, I’m going to gain a bunch of converts.

Oh, yeah….one other thing: my religious beliefs say that that religious nutjobs who pass off their bigotry as religion are not allowed to speak in public, unless this is playing in the background while they speak.

I’m sure you understand, Chuck. We are a nation built on religious tolerance, after all, and if I have to listen to you run your bigoted, felonious mouth without sweet, sweet circus clown music, my deity will be very angry with me, and possibly even make me spend eternity in the afterlife with people like you.

Of course, if Mr. Colson is really worried about the morality of extending full legal protections to a class of people who have historically experienced extreme legal and social discrimination, I have a suggestion for him: he could always move to Iran. After all, they don’t pussyfoot around about the homosexual scourge over there, so Chucky should feel right at home.


* Well okay, perhaps we’re being a bit premature.

 

Won’t someone get her a calculator?

Our good friend Sarah at Trying to Grok is mad at Hillary Clinton:

But Hillary Clinton’s Throwing Money Around Like We Can Just Print More plan is really infuriating.

“Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 “baby bond” from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.”

So how would one go about figuring out if this is a realistic plan (we’ll let you decide whether it would be a good one)? It’s easy when you don’t want to figure out the details:

Obviously it would be irresponsible to suggest this to voters before she’s had a chance to sit down and crunch the numbers, right?

The New York senator did not offer any estimate of the total cost of such a program or how she would pay for it. Approximately 4 million babies are born each year in the United States.

Oh. She’s just speaking out of her ass then.

Seems like it’s par for the course for everyone involved — dismissing it out of your ass is pretty neat too. Maybe some multiplication would be a good place to start? Let’s see… $5,000 x 4,000,000 = whoa, so many zeros… the childrens… hmm, does that make $20,000,000,000 (let’s just call that a $20 billion program). Would the United States Government be able to launch and finance a $20 billion a year expense? Well, given that it’s planning to spend $2,735 billionses (PDF) this fiscal year, one would imagine that yeah, it’s possible. Sure — an extra 0.73% of annual government spending is a totally huge amount of money. Heck, $20 billion wouldn’t even cover more than a few weeks of the war on whatever the hell you want to call it. [Annie Jacobsen calls it the I have had it with these motherfucking Muslims on this motherfucking plane war.]

Bonus: The comments are precious little things too: Read the rest of this entry »

 

Shorter Jules Crittenden

That’s Propa-Tainment!

crittendenhobbyhorse.png
Above: Spoils of war confiscated by US Customs

  • Hoo-ah, fellows! The gritty glory that, I imagine, constitutes the authentic experience of combat soldiers is insufficiently championed by some liberal and defeatist Hollywood movies that I haven’t seen.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard.

 

Impressive

I’ve never played any of the Halo games, but I am impressed that they’re using Chopin’s Raindrop Prelude to market it:

If you prefer to hear the whole piece played by a hot Valentina Igoshina (and I sure do), then I recommend watching this:

And yes, Ann Bartow, I do find her attractive. I’m engaging in total lookism, sexist pig that I am.

 

I Is Too An English Teacher!

This is a good week for me.

My favorite Townhall columnist is back. And by “favorite,” I mean “would you look at the incoherent frothings-at-the-mouth that have come pouring out of Mary Grabar this time.”

grabar3.pngI have to let you know that I’ve read this Grabar column about fifteen times already, and I’m still not sure I know what the hell she’s talking about. This is world-class wingnuttery, folks; I put this column next to a Kaye Grogan piece and the next thing I knew, Grogan’s writing started looking like an essay by Isaiah Berlin. But we’ll see if we can make it through this romp down sanity’s back forty intact, shall we?

Osama bin Laden was cornered by U.S. forces in his cave. He was reported to have been surrounded by 17 virgins whom he blew up along with himself, while shouting “Allahu, Akbar!”

In response, massive rallies were held in Washington.

In front of the Capitol, Cindy Sheehan addressed the crowd through a megaphone: “Did we really need over 3,000 deaths to make this happen? We could have sent cupcakes with sprinkles over to show our goodwill. Who knows? Osama could still be alive. We know that bullies are bullies because they haven’t been shown enough love. WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER!”

The ACLU sent a statement about the U.S. government’s lack of due process.

Oh, goody. We are ten sentences in, and I’ve already got enough strawmen to fill a barn.

I keep going back to that last sentence, though….it’s such a masterpiece of legal WTFery that I can’t stop thinking about it. What does she think the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution has to do with suicide? Or the Fourteenth? How would it even apply to a non-citizen not on U.S. soil? They let this woman grade Freshman composition papers? Is this supposed to be satire? How can I move on with my life, after having been exposed to the truly horrifying inner workings of another person’s mind? Seriously….the Fifth Amendment? WTF?

Luckily, the rest of the column is even more freakishly insane, so I can get myself to stop thinking about this just by moving on to the next few paragraphs:

Read the rest of this entry »

 

So Wait, Dave Vanian Is Working For The DoD?

I Hate All Iranians, US Aide Tells MPs
By SIMON WALTERS
29th September 2007

British MPs visiting the Pentagon to discuss America’s stance on Iran and Iraq were shocked to be told by one of President Bush’s senior women officials: “I hate all Iranians.”

And she also accused Britain of “dismantling” the Anglo-US-led coalition in Iraq by pulling troops out of Basra too soon.

The all-party group of MPs say Debra Cagan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Coalition Affairs to Defence Secretary Robert Gates, made the comments this month.

No no, wait; that’s not the story.

Here’s the story: This is what the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Coalition Affairs to Defense Secretary Robert Gates looks like:

cagan.png
Above: Going for the salty, sticky, rubber-Erwin-Rommel-bath-toy look


Hanx! El Cid

 

Awesome

hunterhacked.png
Above: Duncan Hunter’s website circa 11:10 AM


Note: While we don’t approve of the hacking of people’s websites, it is the case that comedy may be found in many of life’s spectacles.

 

Now this is interesting

I’ll be very interested to see how this turns out:

U.K. band Radiohead will let fans choose how much they want to pay for downloads of its next album.

The message “It’s up to you” appears when clicking on a question mark next to the price of a download for their seventh album, “In Rainbows,” due out Oct. 10. The band began accepting pre-orders on its Web site Sunday.

A completed transaction showed the album can be bought for as little as £.01 (US$.02), plus a £.45 charge for using a credit or debit card.

Radiohead has been among the few hold outs — the Beatles included — whose songs are not available for purchase on Apple’s iTunes Music Store, which sells songs in the U.K. for £.79 with DRM (digital rights management) technology and £.99 without DRM. Albums cost an average of £7.99.

For Radiohead, a top-selling act for about 15 years, the decision poses little risk to the band members’ personal fortunes. But it could prove to be an interesting case study in how successful a group can be in compelling fans to shun illegal downloads and pay what they think the band deserves.

Since I’ve been a huge Radiohead fan for years now, I was willing to pay them $30 (USD) for the album. Yeah, I know that’s a ton of money. In economic terms, I want them to have financial incentive to keep making music. (Not that they need it- it’s just the principle. And since I’ve pirated a billion of their concert recordings over the past few years, it’s the least I can do.)

Now, I understand that many of you probably hate Radiohead (I hear whining about them all the time), but say your favorite band released their album for download on the Intertubes- how much would you pay them for their work?

 

We are the dead

Six years too late, Tom Friedman is making sense:

9/11 has made us stupid. I honor, and weep for, all those murdered on that day. But our reaction to 9/11 — mine included — has knocked America completely out of balance, and it is time to get things right again.

It is not that I thought we had new enemies that day and now I don’t. Yes, in the wake of 9/11, we need new precautions, new barriers. But we also need our old habits and sense of openness. For me, the candidate of 9/12 is the one who will not only understand who our enemies are, but who we are.

Before 9/11, the world thought America’s slogan was: “Where anything is possible for anybody.” But that is not our global brand anymore. Our government has been exporting fear, not hope: “Give me your tired, your poor and your fingerprints.”

You may think Guantánamo Bay is a prison camp in Cuba for Al Qaeda terrorists. A lot of the world thinks it’s a place we send visitors who don’t give the right answers at immigration. I will not vote for any candidate who is not committed to dismantling Guantánamo Bay and replacing it with a free field hospital for poor Cubans. Guantánamo Bay is the anti-Statue of Liberty.

Here’s the problem, though.

The neocons have been so successful at stamping their narratives into popular discourse — e.g., that we only lost Vietnam due to a lack of will! — that any radical, or even moderately significant change, in American policy is seen as politically impossible by our super-courageous Democrats.

Just look at the stupid garbage that’s been passed by the Democratic Congress this year. They’ve given Bush everything he wanted on FISA, they’ve officially condemned MoveOn.org, and they’ve agreed to fund the Iraq war with zero strings attached. Honestly, if a Democrat were elected president and had a filibuster-proof majority in Congress, I don’t think they’d pursue any significant policy change from what Bush is doing. I’m sorry, but that’s the way I see it.

Imagine a Democratic president were to take Tommy Friedman’s suggestion and close Gitmo. He’d be bombarded instantly with Freedom’s Watch ads accusing him of “freeing teh 9/11 killerz!!!1!” Or imagine if he set a date for drawing down American troops in Iraq: He’d get accused in the right-wing media of “SETTING A DATE FOR DEFEAT!!! DOLCHSTOSS!!!” Standing up to such attacks only requires savvy political skills and courage, but none of the major Dem candidates have thus far shown any of the latter (or who knows — maybe they’re just as enthralled with the idea of Pax Americana as the neocons are).

So despite Tommy Friedman’s insistence that we become a sane country again, I’m just not seeing it anytime in the near future. You need some leaders to start pushing back hard against wingnut narratives and ideas, and right now the Dems are too scared of alienating Joe Lieberman to do anything of the sort.