The Founders and the Insulating and the What Now?

Turdblossom on Meet the Press:

MR. ROVE: Yeah, look, here’s the issue. There is a tension between Congress and the executive. Congress wants to be able to call the—this Congress in particular—wants to be able to call presidential aides up at its whim and convenience and have them testify. That would have a chilling effect on the ability of a president to get candid, straightforward advice from his aides. We have a constitutional separation of powers. The founders talk about this. They, they understood this issue, and they wanted to insulate the judicial, the executive and the legislative from each other in this respect.

Mr. Zatkin didn’t mention this “insulating” thing in American Government class. ‘Course I was asleep a lot during his lectures (I had him fifth period, right after lunch). Dollars to donuts, Rove has some footnote from the Federalist Papers in mind when he talks about the desire of the Founders “to insulate” the branches of government. One which could be easily debunked, like Hamilton made an off-the-cuff remark about how cold it gets in legislatures in the winter or something.

But really, this sort of thing just goes to show you that the left blogosphere needs something like the Bat Signal, only instead of a bat, it lights up the night sky with the silhouette of a giant hammer pounding a nail, and when you shine it, Glenzilla swoops in and explains how various wingnuts are dead wrong on the Constitution.

Can we get one of those? A Glenzilla Signal?

Gavin adds: You want me to make one? I like the moon + bat symbology just fine, but perhaps there’s something in a giant silhouetted wingnut.

wingnut1.jpg
Above: I’m just thinking out loud here…

 

More Proof Of The Liberal Math Conspiracy

Curt at Flopping Aces has had it with the pointy-headed interlecturals what is pollutin’ ackademia wif liberalizm:

More Evidence of Liberal Bias in Our Schools and Media

Now is it any wonder the youth in this country are so totally lacking in common sense? Look at the top academia donations given so far for the 2008 election:

college2bdonations.jpg

Yes, this chart of “the top ten educational donors” certainly suggests that “the top ten educational donors” favor Democrats over Republicans. (It’s possible that a high level of education correlates with a high level of not being a gullible maroon.) Let’s look at the article and see the number for total educational donors:

Seventy-six percent of the education industry’s total federal contributions for ’08 has gone to Democrats, on par with the industry’s partisanship in the last two election cycles.

Ah so. And here’s Curt again, showing one reason why conservatism has failed at conquering academia:

A little graph I put together:

donationgraph.jpg

And these are the yahoos teaching our youth. Long ago teachers would not wear their politics on their sleeves, instead they did the job they were hired to do. Teach! Without bias.

Unless this was so long ago that 76% was roughly 88%, via inflation, it looks like Curt has flunked the reading-comprehension portion of today’s quiz.

But wait, naturally there’s more:

The simplest explanation for the college community’s resounding opposition to President Bush, however, may be that professors understand the importance of participating in the political process, are well-versed on issues and—perhaps more so than the general population [—can recognize a threat to their interests, Herrnson of the University of Maryland said. “Faculty will get involved when they feel like something big is at stake.”]

Yup, it’s all because they are so much smarter than the rest of us.

Actually, we have data on that.

smartrons.jpg
Above: ‘Us’ comprises the set of identified humans who wear clothing and have mastered fire

[Hanx! Righteous Bubba]

 

Skube Don’t

Shorter LA Times Op-Ed Page

Blogs: All the noise that fits
The hard-line opinions on weblogs are no substitute for the patient fact-finding of reporters.

ipj_conf_scube.gif
Above: Pulitzer winner Michael Skube

  • While I don’t have time to read the so-called ‘bloogs,’ I have a little lesson for ranting fact-free partisans like Markos Yglesias and Joshua Marshall Micah: Boys, there’s this little thing that we reporters like to call “doing your homework”…

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard.


Dep’t of There-He-Said-It-Again: Josh Marshall emailed Skube and found that he hadn’t even read TPM, and claims that an editor inserted the reference into the column. Here’s Ed Cone on Skube’s last attempt, in late 2005, to write about the web bloogs without reading any of them:

I asked him what blogs he had read to prepare for his column. He told me he found that to be a very strange question. “I scanned a bunch of blogs,” he said, but was able to summon only one (Andrew Sullivan’s) by name.

Given his statement that blogs don’t do real journalism, I asked him what he thought about Josh Marshall’s Talking Points Memo. He remembered Marshall as a magazine writer, but was unfamiliar with his blog, or its new investigative-reporting plan.

I asked him to compare the original reporting model promised by Pajamas Media with the commentary-oriented approach of the Huffington Post. He told me he didn’t know either site.

Since he wanted to talk about the time factor, I asked him if he didn’t find sites like Instapundit convenient ways to gain access to more information in less time. He had heard of Glenn Reynolds, and visited the site. Once.

Perhaps most incredible, he published in the Greensboro paper a column that says, “At local levels, one can imagine bloggers spurring more comprehensive coverage by mainstream media. But we are not there yet.”

He did not know that Greensboro is a hotbed of local blogging, and its paper has received national acclaim (including articles in the New York Times and LA Times) for its interaction with those bloggers. I asked him what he thought of Sandy Carmany’s blog. “Who?,” he said.

But to be rigorously fair to Mr. Skube, he entered into his latest broadside at a disadvantage, having almost certainly never read the above post, either.

Update: Um, that was a joke before, saying ‘Shorter New York Times Op-Ed Section’ — the joke being the making of an egregious error even whilst… Ah, whatever; that conceptual stuff doesn’t always play out.

Dep’t of Fine-Then-Let’s-Call-It-A-Mulligan: Skube also claims, somewhat archly, that the Washington Post won a Pulitzer for its Walter Reed series. Sadly, No. Fellow journalism professor Jay Rosen remarks on this and other details and offers Mr. Skube some wise counsel:

Retire, man. I’m serious. You’re an embarrassment to my profession, to the university where you teach, and to the craft of reporting you claim to defend. It is time for you to quit, as you’ve clearly called it quits on learning— and reporting. Ring this guy up and ask him to go bass fishing or something.

Yow. Of course, since Rosen published that in his on-line bloog journal, Skube will never see it or know who to call to go bass fishing. Hey Skube, it’s Neil Henry!

…Oh fie, he’ll never see us saying that either.

 

“I’m The Proud Owner Of Karl Rove’s Father’s Solid Gold Cock Ring.”

Well this is certainly interesting:

The “Jim” in this story is the Jim Ward who started the piercing industry. Louie is Louis Claude Rove whose adopted son’s first name is Karl. Louie died quietly in Palm Springs as his very secular, not-believing son ran President Bush’s campaign for President of the United States that energized the Christian evangelical base around the wedge issue of gay marriage…

As I watched the news this week, I saw a Karl Rove standing beside the President, his voice crocking, talking about his love for Bush and his country but over that “noise,” I heard the memory of Joe Koons whispering in my ear.

“You do know who his son is?”

…Oh My God!

And now I wondered if that son ever cried for the man who raised him and watched him grow up? I’d be curious as to how Karl Rove would ever explain his pierced, gay father?

Now apropos Karl, if someone could only explain the Jeff Gannon thing, with the, you know, White House press credentials under an assumed name and without any Secret Service or FBI screening, and the apparent having-of-access to secret CIA memos, and so forth…

310805jeff_gannon_cspan.jpg
Above: The Matt “Dirty” Sanchez of the Rooftop Bar set

[Hanx! Anon]

 

LOLconCON (A Convention Of LOLcons)!!1

By John:

1151904457_317869ebb2.jpg
Above: Mark Foley


By M. Bouffant:

am-sadd-mi-2-doughbob-sez-ai-heer-2-lng.jpg
Above (l-r): George W. Bush, Karl Rove


By Instaputz:

lolledeen.jpg
Above: Michael Ledeen


By Lame Man:

pay-no-atenshun-to-mah-adms-appl-1.jpg
Above: Ann Coulter


By Drummer Hoff:

netanyahupuppy.jpg
Above: Benjamin Netanyahu

chalabikhatami.jpg
Above (l-r):Ahmed Chalabi, Mohammed Khatami, unidentified Iranian official

perleeated.jpg
Above: Richard Perle

wolfowitzchalabi.jpg
Above (l-r) Ahmed Chalabi, Iraq, Paul Wolfowitz:


By His Grace:

lolconharry.jpg
Above: Harry Whittington


By Teh Mysterious Not-Brad-R.-Person:

im-in-ur-vortex-pretendin-2-b-u-1.jpg
Above: Definitely Not Ann Althouse


By Scott Durocher:

krautdavros1.jpg
Above: Charles Krauthammer


‘LOLcons’ concept created by Jon Swift and named by Marita. (Online LOLcat builder here.)


 

Gettin My Thank Ya-Yas Out

I want to thank everyone who donated so generously to my bleg. You’ve saved my ass: The co-op agreed to let me pay my bill Wednesday, by which time your donations will have cleared into my account. Plus I have a bit extra for nicotine, caffeine and food (my necessary fuels for writing, and in that order).

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Fixing The Internet

amthink.jpg

acanthuslsmall.jpgacanthussmall.jpg

Read the rest of this entry »

 

LOLcons

lolreynolds.jpg
Above: Glenn Reynolds

lolallen.jpg
Above: Bob Allen (R-Merritt Island [FL])


‘LOLcons’ concept created by Jon Swift and named by Marita. (Online LOLcat builder here.)


[Submitted by Notochord]

 

Shorter Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds

SCOTT BEAUCHAMP: Tip of the Iceberg.

badger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gifbadger2.gif

  • Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp, Beauchamp…

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard.


[+ link]

 

LOLcons

jonahbooklolcon.jpg
Above (L-R): Unknown, Jonah Goldberg


‘LOLcons’ concept created by Jon Swift and named by Marita. (Online LOLcat builder here.)


[Hanx: Fish]