Posted on March 22nd, 2008 by Gavin M.
ABOVE: Help! We’re trapped in here with Mark Steyn!
The boys at RedState today introduce us to Mark Milke of the Calgary Herald, who provides a fine type-specimen of the wingnut paleolith, lying-with-statistics:
Viva Castro’s departure
Cuba in 2008 should be the Hong Kong or Singapore of Latin America
In 1958, the year before Fidel Castro came to power in a revolution and promised prosperity, democracy and the restoration of Cuba’s 1940 constitution, the Caribbean island, while troubled by poverty, a corrupt dictator and the American Mafia, was also better off than most developing nations.
While poor compared to the United States, Cuba in 1958 had a per capita GDP of $3,170 according to the OECD. (Canada’s was $8,947.). But Cuba outranked all other Latin American countries except four: Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Venezuela.
Tellingly, in 1958, the island nation’s per person wealth was higher than any East Asian country or colony, save Japan, which barely beat Cuba at only $3,290.1 Hong Kong had a per capita GDP of $2,924, Singapore’s was $2,294, the Philippines’ was $1,447, Taiwan’s per person GDP stood at $1,387 and South Korea’s was $1,112.
Thus in 1958, Cuba was almost as rich as Japan, one and half times as wealthy as Singapore, richer than Hong Kong, and three times as prosperous as South Korea.
Oh, they’re still trying that one, are they?
[spits on hands, hoists ancient Texas Instruments LED calculator]
- McDonald’s Corporation 2006 revenues: $21.6 billion.2
- Total number of employees, worldwide, 2006: 465,000
Thus according to the latest available figures, at $46,451.61 per full- and part-time employee, McDonald’s workers all over the world are wealthier than the average American.
It’s amazing the mileage you can get out of the old average-vs.-median conflation. It’s like those 1950s American cars still rattling down the streets of Havana.
Fifty years later, Cuba is one of the poorest countries in Latin America.
Whoah, how did that happen?
Meanwhile, jurisdictions such as Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan (the latter two also had dictators and problems similar to Cuba in the 1950s) have long eclipsed Cuba. They’ve done so not only in per capita wealth, but in measurements Castro’s defenders point to when they assert the Marxist revolution “worked,” such as in health care and education
As opposed to the US, which for all its wealth, um, [mumble mumble] health and education [mumble mumble] thingy.
The irony of Cuba’s position became even more evident recently.
We’d say just now.
The gents at RedState comment:
The article goes on to argue for an end to the U.S. trade embargo.3 This may be a good idea, but it is worth noting anew that the dearth of trade from one country–even one as powerful as the United States–is not enough to explain Cuba’s economic woes.
Or, to carry that reasoning into hard numbers: Since there are roughly 200 countries in the world, we can make a quick back-of-the-envelope calculation and argue that the US is only responsible for about 1/2 of 1% of these woes — or only about half a wo.
And come to mention it, so is Canada.
Update: As is inevitable with these things, we’ve been accused of a softness toward Cuban Communism. Um, yeah. Also, the reason we doubted all those stories of WMDs in Iraq, and were against the invasion and so forth, was because we supported Saddam Hussein. These days, we’re busy doubting anti-Iranian propaganda and atrocity stories because we condone the execution of homosexuals and are against women’s rights. Some of us favor Barack Obama because we dislike white people.
1 It almost seems as though there should be a reason for Japan’s poor economic performance in the given period.
2 McDonald’s figures are from here.
3 Milke: “It’s a significant reason for Cuba’s poverty, that and the Communist system itself — and both should end. Cuban-Americans don’t have to give up their claims to property confiscated by Castro and his thugs, but that can be dealt with if and when Cuba becomes a liberal, market-oriented democracy.”