Loose Lips Sink Drips

Obama: ‘You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig.’

Incredible Hulkin: ‘GAH! HULKIN SMASH! HULKIN SMASH PUNY OBAMA! MAKE DOUBLE-ENTENDRE THING ABOUT HULKIN FRIEND PALIN!!! PUNY OBAMA SEXIST!!! WHAT? HULKIN UPDATE? WHY HULKIN UPDATE? WHAT GREAT GAZOOGLE SAY? GREAT GAZOOGLE SAY HULKIN FRIEND MCCAIN SAY LIPSTICK-ON-PIG-THING TOO!?! MCCAIN-FRIEND SAY LIPSTICK-ON-PIG THING ABOUT NEW ENEMY-FRIEND HILLARY CLINTON!?! ARGGHHH!!! NOW HULKIN HEAD HURT! HULKIN SMASH PUNY OBAMA-FRIEND GREAT GAZOOGLE THAT MAKE HULKIN HEAD HURT!!!’


Tintin adds: I’m also surprised they didn’t say this:

OMG THEN HE SAID FISH. HE CALLED HER A FISH. FISH IS WHAT FAGS CALL WOMEN. OBAMA IS A MEAN FAG WHO CALLS WOMEN FISH. FAGGETY, FAGGETY, FAG, FAG, FAG!!!!!

Even assuming that Obama meant to call Palin a pig, this is more of the Republican Italian soccer player fake penalty gambit where the player throws himself on the ground, screams bloody murder, grasps an allegedly injured limb while pointing at an opponent yelling “Red Card! Red Card!” They’ve spent the campaign calling Obama a traitor who would be willing to lose a war to win a campaign. By any measure, calling someone a pig in response is, well, only a mild retort and not worthy of the faux-histrionics that the Republicans are mustering up over the pig business.

 

The Fact Is Global Warming Is A Lie (UPDATED)

ABOVE: Jules Crittenden


If I were to tell you that the latest arrow in the wingnut global cooling quiver is The Old Farmer’s Almanac, you would probably suggest that the stress of my lurking about the wingnut-o-sphere searching for blogging material had finally taken its toll on me and that I was imagining things. You’d tell me to rent a cabin somewhere in the mountains and take the dog with me for a long vacation from the Internet.

But that would only prove that you hadn’t visited Jules Crittenden’s blog lately. Crittenden is, among other things, a “science” columnist for the esteemed Boston Herald, the Boston tabloid best known for having once printed a satirical Andy Borowitz column about a proposed gunfight between Dick Cheney and Hillary Clinton as an actual news article.

So, Al Gore, cower in fear as Jules Crittenden uses The Old Farmer’s Almanac to take you and your silly ideas about global warming to school:

Old Farmer’s Almanac predicts a cold winter kicking off early for Thanksgiving. A couple of warm spring months, and we’re back into a cold summer and fall up this way. … If I didn’t know better, I’d say it almost sounds like that Little Ice Age might be kicking in.

Crittenden is obviously employing a little known axiom of the scientific method that says that if the researcher sees something happen once, and the researcher likes what he sees, then the researcher can scientifically predict that it will occur over and over again as often as the researcher would like. One cold winter? Well, that’s proof positive of a hundred cold winters to come. Send the folks at NOAA home, those idiots. We’re on our way to another Little Ice Age! Call Sarah Palin and make an appointment to go mastodon hunting.

This well-respected and completely scientific argument permitting a general conclusion from one instance is further backed up by the crack team of researchers and climate scientists at the Old Farmer’s Almanac, who also see us headed into another Little Ice Age.

Hang on. via Boston Herald, OFA thinks we’re headed into a decades-long cooling trend.

Based on the same time-honored, complex calculations it uses to predict weather, the almanac hits the newsstands today saying a study of solar activity and corresponding records on ocean temperatures and climate point to a cooler, not warmer, climate, for perhaps the next half century.

It remains to be seen, said Editor in Chief Jud Hale, whether the human impact on global temperatures will cancel out or override any cooling trend.

“We say that if human beings were not contributing to global warming, it would become real cold in the next 50 years,” Hale said.

So, if you don’t want to freeze to death, you’d better sell your hybrid car and replace it with a Hummer.

Another part of the scientific method relied on by the Almanac is a well known, but little used, exception to the peer-review rule. That exception to peer-review can be invoked when a scientist employs a technique that is really, really secret and can’t be disclosed to anyone, particularly to peer-reviewers who will steal the idea for their own nefarious purposes.

OFA relies on a formula more than 200 years old that incorporates the study of sunspots and other factors they don’t reveal.

Not only did Crittenden fall for this Farmer’s Almanac piffle, but Elizabeth Scalia, the wingnut who pretends to be a nun over at The Anchoress, swallowed it hook, crucifix and rosary as well. I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised any more at folks using The Old Farmer’s Almanac as an authority on climate change, because these same folks believe that the Book of Genesis trumps all scientific inquiry on the origin of man.

UPDATE: Oh, sweet merciful Lord. Life imitates comments. Crittenden is now worried that the Large Hardon, er, Hadron Collider will cause the end of the world.

 

Snorter David Brooks

The Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now

  • The Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now.

H/t: El Cid in comments.


‘Snorter’ concept created by The Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now and perfected by The Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now. We are aware that the Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now.™


Update: The Republicans are intellectually unfit to govern right now.

 

Shorter Mona Charen


ABOVE: Mona Charen’s homage to Nancy Sinatra

Is Trig at the Heart of Media’s Reaction to Palin?

  • Liberals hate Sarah Palin because she didn’t abort Trig.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

The Dish Ran Away With The Pork

Sarah Palin famously said “‘thanks, but no thanks’ on that bridge to nowhere” … choosing instead to build a much more useful road to nowhere.

 

Wanker

The guy in the picture above isn’t a Russian gangster. No, he’s Nick Cohen, a concern-trolling British neocon who pretends to be liberal. Over the weekend, Cohen offered up the most preposterous defense of Sarah Palin so far heard on either side of the Atlantic:

[Palin] proved her support for the Iraq War by sending her son to fight in it. …

It’s not quite clear how Palin “sent” her son to Iraq. Did she threaten to ground him if he didn’t go? Did she march him down to the recruiting office at gun point? Or perhaps as Commander-in-Chief of the Wasilla White Militia Alaska National Guard, she drafted him and then mobilized his unit to Iraq?

Hat tip to Lord Andrew Throckmorton Farthington Stuttaford, the Seventh Duke of West Brixtonshire, who linked to Cohen at America’s Shittiest Website™ and who provided, as “context” for ASW’s web-challenged readers, a description of Cohen as “moderate left,” which is about as accurate as saying that John Podhoretz is “moderately attractive.”

 

Shorter George F. Will


Above: Will be counting his money while you suckers are still
grappling with the pickle matrix.

Are You Better Off?

  • It is axiomatic that the personal, financial assessment most voters should take after a period of Democratic rule is not necessarily the same kind of assessment they should take when the incumbent party is the GOP.

Or (alternate shorter):

  • Hey, peons: Just because you’re financially worse off now than you were four or even eight years ago doesn’t mean that you aren’t better off in other areas in your life totally unrelated to politics, and for which you should reward the Republican party with your vote.

Or (another alternate):

  • What was right for St. Ronnie (whom I coached for debate and whose opponent’s campaign strategy book I stole) to say in 1980 is never right for Democratic presidential candidates to say, even if they have just as much or more cause for saying it.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


 

Shorter Ace

Anatomy of a Smear

  • The vile Andrew Sullivan thinks he can get away with trashing Sarah Palin with nothing more than shamelessly unsourced speculation and nasty innuendo. What he didn’t count on was that my own righteously unsourced speculation and noble innuendo clearly shows that Barack Obama!!!!1! is the true source of Sullivan’s speculation and innuendo.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™


Tintin adds:

Even Shorter Ace

  • Andrew Sullivan is a fag.
 

Spitegasm

Atrios:

Pissing Off Liberals

It’s long been the case that what really gets the Republican base excited is anything that pisses off liberals. There are genuine policy differences, of course, but to get an audience of Republicans on their feet and cheering you need to mention something, no matter how pointless, which pisses of liberals. It’s the glue that keeps them together.


Above: Manatee Spite Caucus frolics in celebration
of elevating your blood pressure.

Pod Person fils demonstrates, adds MOAR:

Choke On It, Part Deux

Earlier this week, I suggested that there was rough justice in the fact that those people who peddled the false and disgusting rumors about Sarah Palin and her recently born son Trig had made it possible for Palin to release the news of her daughter’s pregnany in a way that was actually far less damaging than it might otherwise have been to her standing. I titled that blog item “Choke On It.”

Well, it has gotten worse for them…The results are astonishing. It appears 37.2 million people tuned in to watch Palin’s speech last night, only a million shy of Barack Obama’s total last week — making it the second most-watched convention address in history…Without the hysteria surrounding Palin’s selection, her audience would surely have been reduced by as many as 13 million viewers, which would have put it at the same level as Joe Biden’s (24.4 million).

 

Question For McCain

After eight years of Bush-Cheney, why’d you go and put another Big Oil politician on your ticket?