Because I’m a commie America hater, I sometimes read news sources from other countries. Earlier this week, I was reading an article in The Guardian about a British torture scandal. This is what I found (all emphasis mine):
MI5 faces fresh torture allegations
The home secretary Jacqui Smith faces legal action over allegations that MI5 agents colluded in the torture of a British former civil servant by Bangladeshi intelligence officers..
Right off the bat you notice a difference. A high-ranking government official is actually facing a legal action for her alleged role in torturing somebody. You’ll also notice that the opening graf contains no references to Jack Bauer or ticking time bombs. Continuing:
Lawyers for the British man, Jamil Rahman, are to file a damages claim alleging that Smith was complicit in assault, unlawful arrest, false imprisonment and breaches of human rights legislation over his alleged ill-treatment while detained in Bangladesh.
The claims bring to three the number of countries in which British intelligence agents have been accused of colluding in the torture of UK nationals. Rahman says that he was the victim of repeated beatings over a period of more than two years at the hands of Bangladeshi intelligence officers, and he claims that a pair of MI5 officers were blatantly involved in his ordeal.
The two men would leave the room where he was being interrogated whenever he refused to answer their questions, he says, and he would be severely beaten. They would then return to the room to resume the interrogation.
Oh wow! So it’s not like the British government even the MI5 to torture the guy themselves! They just left the room and pretended not to know he was being tortured by other people. And they’re still facing legal action over it! And again, still no mention of how tuff Jack Bauer is!
Now here’s the part that will really blow your mind:
The alleged complicity of the MI5 officers who failed to report or do anything to prevent torture appears to be in line with a secret government-approved interrogation policy at the time. Gordon Brown has ordered a review of the policy, but there have been numerous calls for an independent inquiry into the affair.
Among those demanding an inquiry are opposition leaders David Cameron and Nick Clegg; Ken Macdonald, the former director of public prosecutions; Lord Carlile of Berriew, the government’s independent reviewer of counter-terrorism legislation; Lord Howe, foreign secretary in the Thatcher government, and Lord Guthrie, former chief of defence staff.
For those of you who don’t follow British politics, Cameron is the leader of Britain’s Conservative Party. Which, as you may have guessed by its title, is the center-right party in the U.K. You’ll notice that Cameron is actually demanding an independent inquiry instead of giving a speech at the American Enterprise Institute telling us all how swell torture is. Nor is he telling us that Jack Bauer would so have approved torturing this guy because otherwise the terrorists would blow up the Queen Mum.
Why is our country the only Western democracy whose government officials outspokenly support torture? Have we become that depraved?
Say, let’s look at another article to see how David Cameron differs from our country’s right-wing leaders:
David Cameron: I would reduce No 10’s power
David Cameron will tomorrow pledge to deliver the most dramatic redistribution of power in living memory as he attempts to deal with the concerns of voters left disgusted by the row over MPs’ expenses.
In a broad-ranging article in the Guardian, Cameron declares that he would trim back the powers of the prime minister and boost the role of parliament to win back public confidence.
What the hell. Why can’t we get center-right leaders like this? Hey Britain, if you send us David Cameron, we’ll gladly trade you Newt Gingrich and Dick Cheney.