Critical mass? A Gladwellian “tipping point”? Something’s up, something fucking wonderful: The left blogosphere is rejecting, in a projectile-vomit-followed-by-many-a-dry-heave sort of way, “Sensible Liberals” and “Technocrat Centrists”.
Naturally, Nyhan in the link paints himself victim of left-wing, überpartisan apparatchiks, but then he projects his own failings on others just as well as he engages in bullshit even-handedness. But then again, false equivalencies (or “bullshit even-handedness”; a better phrase than the poisoned-by-neocons phrase “moral equivalence”, which they stole from Orwell) inevitably come from those who espouse a bullshit centrism which is not objectively centrist at all.
Also notice that Nyhan most predictably bemoans the downfall of The New Republic which …yes, he blames on partisan attacks by Kos and Atrios. I’m sure Marty’s check is in the mail, Brendan. Anyway, this is completely backwards just as Nyhan’s estimation of his own predicament is backwards. TNR’s nemeses aren’t the real apparatchiks any more than Nyhan’s are. TNR and Nyhan are the real ideologues, insisting that anyone to the Left of their “center” is just as wrong, just as bad for the country, as anyone to their Right. You may be as far Left [sic] as the DLC, but no farther! Yeah, well fuck that shit.
The wingnuts of course don’t care what ‘centrists’ think, only that until now they have been a brake on a real Leftwing opposition, which is why Doughy Pantload is taking Nyhan’s side. But more importantly, the ‘centrists’ know that the wingnuts don’t care what they think, but they attack Left and Right with ‘equal’ measure anyway. Which, in turn, means they …Ahhh, are useful and willing idiots for the wingnuts. (Apparatchik-talk is contagious; you purge us, we’ll purge you.)





