Quiddity over at Uggabugga asks:
… saying that there is little progress in Iraq, is a stab in the back. Right?
Let’s go ask Dan Riehl.

Playing Politics With Terrorism And War
While Hillary Clinton continues to take some flak for playing politics with terrorism, will there be a sound about the obvious playing of politics concerning war, given these quotes below from a WaPo article on the leaking of a draft GAO report designed to undermine support for the war in Iraq? And isn’t leaking potentially classifiable material before it has an opportunity to be classified basically as criminal as leaking it after the fact?
So yes, in Dan’s America, it doesn’t matter whether information is actually classified or not: If it’s potentially classifiable, it’s a criminal act to leak it. And since negative information about the war is never value-neutral, but is ‘designed to undermine,’ such a leak is also a moral crime, and a stab-in-the-back (i.e., a dolchstoss).
…That is, if the information treasonously makes Republicans or their programs look bad. Otherwise, you know, ‘free speech.’
Here’s how Dan brings it home (emphasis his):
The person who provided the draft report to The Post said it was being conveyed from a government official who feared that its pessimistic conclusions would be watered down in the final version — as some officials have said happened with security judgments in this month’s National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq.
More likely said government official feared recent polling and reporting suggesting a general increase in support for our efforts in Iraq.
Cowardly saboteurs are forever scheming, etc.





