Almost got it. Unless, of course, it’s supposed to make TIDOS Wankee look like the type of gibbering idiot who’s mouth keeps moving even though he’s stopped making sounds. I knew a lot of guys like that growing up, so if that’s what we’re going for here, good show.

But is your sound muted? It’s supposed to…

Hm. You’re saying it doesn’t make any sound?

I kin hear it.

Transcend linear narratives? I am -so- there. Can we also transgress some boundaries with transformative hermeneutics? You can pretend to be Jeff Godlstein while I pretend to be an adoring audience who thinks Jeff is a good writer.

Heh. Still cracks me up.

Hermeneutics? Was that after the Hermits?

No, it makes sound. The giggle cuts out before the video does. It just reminded me of a toothless old cracker who’s, say, giggling at some disgusting thought or other.

[Added a link to Bubba’s URL]

Took some of that nighttime cold medicine not long ago, time to go kersplat. ‘Night, all!

It just reminded me of a toothless old cracker who’s, say, giggling at some disgusting thought or other.

Oh, so it works fine then.

The fact is, the wonderful Confederate Yankee’s image makes me hear my beloved Dueling Banjos in my head. Ahh, the Heartland.

Heh, it’sJed Clampet’s long lost buried-on-purpose nephew.

Now I just KNOW “S,N!” is way cool because it even has its own YouTuber channel. YT is of course only frequented by the most elitist of highbrow intellectuals, as displayed so often in the comment section of any of its fine & edifying videos.

Hey, give CY some credit – we can’t ALL type that well one-handed, after all.
(cf. Adult Chatrooms)

Elmer Fudd woulda been more appropriate. Not that this isn’t spot on tho.

Gomer’s future is laid out in the Globe and Mail.

By the way is that Charlie McCarthy’s mouth you married to Neoconfederate Yankee?

Is this some sort of internet tradition?

Looks like we have a mystery on our hands, gang.

So, did the Scooby Doo and Mystery Machine crew ever get to the point of killing someone in vigilante justice?

I don’t remember that.

So, did the Scooby Doo and Mystery Machine crew ever get to the point of killing someone in vigilante justice?

I remember something about Mama Cass and a marshmallow machine. Not sure if anyone was killed, but it seems likely.

Shorter Confederate Yankee: Fucking city-slicker judges and their high-and-mighty lynching laws – we’ll show them who the real Americans are!

I read that Wankee column yesterday and found myself, believe it or not, disgusted. I’ve been dropping in at the Wankee’s for years now, and I’m certain that this stand against vigilantism is just a pose–Owens and his hangers-on love that kind of thing. It’s what fuels their wet dreams. He’s pretending to be against it because it was a SCOTUS decision. Otherwise, those yayhoos get all giggety over the whole “let’s fondle our guns” thing. If the Codpiece had suggested it–or, even better, Michael Yon–Owens would have quivering and jumping up and down with excitement like a chihuahua.

So, did the Scooby Doo and Mystery Machine crew ever get to the point of killing someone in vigilante justice?

Well, not many of them survived Camp Crystal Lake. (Audio during the credits not work nor sanity safe)

Heh. Still cracks me up.
Yeh. Glad you do funny as public service.

By the way is that Charlie McCarthy’s mouth you married to Neoconfederate Yankee?

Proving once again that context is everything, the mouth actually belongs to Claudia Schiffer.

<i.Proving once again that context is everything, the mouth actually belongs to Claudia Schiffer.

On the topic of Elizabeth and Dennis Kucinich, can anyone explain this to me:
David Copperfield
Matthew Vaughn

Damn you WordPress!!1one

I can’t explain it, DKW, but I can offer another anecdote of a different kind:

Edith Piaf (46) and her second husband, Theo Sarapo (26)

Thanks pedestrian, but still waiting for the look-ism police. Maybe if I mention that Rosie looks like she ate Kelli Carpenter, and I don’t mean that in a sexual way.

So is “Ow, my back!” the new “Ow! My Balls!”?

Well, Gavin, people assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective view point, it’s more like a big ball of wibley-wobbley timey-wimey stuff.

Well, Gavin, people assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective view point, it’s more like a big ball of wibley-wobbley timey-wimey stuff cube of four simultaneous days.

Fixed.

Dragon-King Wangchuck said,

Thank you, DKW. That was excellent.