Jan
12

Sweet Jeebus Do I Hate Joe Lieberman




Posted at 15:44 by Brad

Dear Joe Lieberman,

You are the biggest loser in the history of loserdom. You are a bigger loser than Kevin Federline. You are a bigger loser than the entire Italian Army. You are a bigger loser than the goddamned LA Clippers.

loserman.jpg
“Pointing out that Bush sucks only divides the nation!”

This is why:

Sen. Joe Lieberman, the only Democrat to endorse President Bush’s new plan for Iraq, has quietly backed away from his pre-election demands that the White House turn over potentially embarrassing documents relating to its handling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans.

Lieberman’s reversal underscores the new role that he is seeking to play in the Senate as the leading apostle of bipartisanship, especially on national-security issues. On Wednesday night, Bush conspicuously cited Lieberman’s advice as being the inspiration for creating a new “bipartisan working group� on Capitol Hill that he said will “help us come together across party lines to win the war on terror.�

But the decision by Lieberman, the new chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, to back away from the committee’s Katrina probe is already dismaying public-interest groups and others who hoped the Democratic victory in November would lead to more aggressive investigations of one of the White House’s most spectacular foul-ups.

Absolutely not. Pointing out that the Bush administration is disastrously and dangerously inept at governing is a sure sign of (OOOOOGA-BOOGA-BOOGA!) partisanship. And we all know how much Joe Lieberman (and Ann Althouse, and the Ole Perfesser and other noted moderates) simply deplores partisanship. Loser.

37 Comments »

  1. Gus said,

    January 12, 2007 at 15:47

    LA Clippers? He’s a bigger loser than the Washington Generals.

  2. Canucklehead said,

    January 12, 2007 at 16:05

    Washington Generals? He’s a bigger loser than the Really Rottens.

  3. Jeff Fecke said,

    January 12, 2007 at 16:36

    The Really Rottens? He’s a bigger loser than Jeff Goldstein.

  4. General Woundwort said,

    January 12, 2007 at 16:38

    Really Rottens? He’s a bigger loser than Randy Constan

  5. Canucklehead said,

    January 12, 2007 at 16:52

    Randy Constan!?! Sweet Jesus Monkey Balls!

    Victory is Yours Woundwort.

  6. TomMil said,

    January 12, 2007 at 17:03

    Woundwort,

    How the hell did you find that?!!!!!!!!

  7. Jeff Fecke said,

    January 12, 2007 at 17:04

    You’re right, Woundwort–I can’t compete with that.

    But Joe Lieberman can.

  8. ifthethunderdontgetya³² said,

    January 12, 2007 at 17:29

    Loserman, talking about Katrina back in January 2006.

    P.S. Tbogg has a photo spread.

  9. teh l4m3 said,

    January 12, 2007 at 17:41

    That needs to be Barbara Boxer in charge of securing those documents… Joe Lieberman would probably offer to do the shredding/hard drive scrubbing…

  10. Otto Man said,

    January 12, 2007 at 18:39

    Game set and match to the discovery of Randy Constan.

    It’s apt, too. Both he and Joe are in deep, deep denial about just how preciously special they are.

  11. General Woundwort said,

    January 12, 2007 at 18:48

    Victory is mine? Woo-hoo!

    What do I win? I hope it isn’t this CD.

    Randy does have something in common with Joe and his BFF George. None of them want to grow up.

  12. TRex said,

    January 12, 2007 at 18:48

    I swear we did everything we could to get rid of him. Joe Lieberman is apparently the electoral equivalent of herpes. The gift that keeps on giving.

  13. Lesley said,

    January 12, 2007 at 19:03

    Screw banana cream, this man needs a steaming shit pie flung in his face.

  14. Canucklehead said,

    January 12, 2007 at 19:24

    General, you win a self-paid vacation to assume command of a Elite L.A.R.P. Commando Team

    Congrats!

  15. BinkyBoy said,

    January 12, 2007 at 19:25

    Why is this fucknut still heading a Committee? Sorry, you lost the election for Democrat, Joe. You don’t just keep your committee seats because you managed to bribe enough Connecticut voters.

  16. Lame Man said,

    January 12, 2007 at 19:41

    Who is Lieberman’s counterpart in the House, regarding Katrina investigations? And is that person prepared to pick up his slack?

  17. ace of jade said,

    January 12, 2007 at 19:53

    That photo is smug, orange and ‘orrible. Makes him look like the last baked bean on a plate.

    Perfect photo, in fact.

  18. Otto Man said,

    January 12, 2007 at 20:13

    Is there any way he can be recalled by Connecticut voters? Can the new anti-Lieberman head of the Connecticut for Lieberman party do something?

  19. kiche said,

    January 12, 2007 at 20:25

    Hi, my parents house got destroyed in Katrina. Many of my friends and relatives lost all of their worldly possessions in Katrina. I also know a few people who died. One do to the slow response from the government.

    Following Lieberman’s 2006 campaign it was clear that he had no problem with race baiting. In this latest move it is clear that he has no problem with racism and ethnic cleansing. Why has no one pointed this out?

  20. ifthethunderdontgetya³² said,

    January 12, 2007 at 20:46

    Who is Lieberman’s counterpart in the House, regarding Katrina investigations?

    Rep. Bennie G. Thompson
    (D-MS)

    As to picking up the slack, let’s hope so.

  21. sister mary martha said,

    January 12, 2007 at 20:59

    Hey! lay off the Clippers! They made the play-offs last year and the Lackers didn’t.

    Sure they stink again this year…

  22. Lesley said,

    January 12, 2007 at 21:12

    Joe is still bragging on his web site about all he’s done for Katrina victims, though. Perhaps a few emails condemning his hypocrisy are in order?

    http://lieberman.senate.gov/documents/reports/2006accomplishments.pdf

  23. Anne Laurie said,

    January 13, 2007 at 0:55

    Lieberman’s a bigger loser than his BFF Dubya, even. At least the C-Plus Augustus will go to the top of the list of Worst Presidents Ever. The list of Bootlicking Congressional Toadies Who Sold Out Their Constituents is so tediously long that Lieberman won’t even rate an asterisk in the history books. He won’t rank as thesis material at a fourth-rate EDoc mill — in Connecticut.

  24. Fidel Cigar said,

    January 13, 2007 at 1:15

    Joe Lieberman: the hemorrhoidal itch of liberal nutroots everywhere. Keep it up, Joe!

  25. Smiling Mortician said,

    January 13, 2007 at 1:45

    Ach, that picture! I have such a visceral reaction to it. Couldn’t place who it reminded me of, exactly, I just knew I wanted to slap that face. At first I thought it was this guy, but that wasn’t quite right. Maybe him? Nah. Or this? Nope. Finally I realized there just is no substitute.

  26. Justin Slotman said,

    January 13, 2007 at 1:59

    Yeah, a contemporary NBA metaphor would be “bigger loser than the goddamned New York Knickerbockers.” (Though the Clippers have fallen off this season. Stupid Dunleavy.)

  27. dontkillwhitey said,

    January 13, 2007 at 6:20

    I can’t believe no one has mentioned the Arizona Cardinals.

  28. Christian said,

    January 13, 2007 at 6:31

    Woundwort

    I’m taking you on dude.

    Lieberman is a bigger loser than Brian Peppers

  29. not a troll said,

    January 13, 2007 at 9:07

    If Joe is such a loser, I guess Gore must not be the sharpest tool in the shed for picking him as his side kick. Maybe global warming was beginning to affect Gore’s brain.

  30. An Outhouse said,

    January 13, 2007 at 9:15

    You know, I’d be proud to have the multitudes squat and ‘do their business’ in me, as long as Joe Lieberman was at the bottom of the pit

  31. not a troll said,

    January 13, 2007 at 9:20

    Jesus said, “Love your enemies.”

  32. LanceThruster said,

    January 13, 2007 at 11:50

    Zell Lieberman makes Quisling look like a patriot.

  33. Gratis said,

    January 13, 2007 at 18:44

    Joe’s a Democrat? Did he switch parties again after he didn’t get elected as one? I’m so confused.

  34. Loser said,

    January 13, 2007 at 21:08

    Loser with a job.

  35. Marq said,

    January 14, 2007 at 3:41

    Unfortunately, Lie berman seems to have Dems over a bit of a barrel–if they had pulled his committee chair, I’m sure he would have had no problem whatsoever in switching officially to being a Republican, thus throwing the Senate into a 50-50 tie, giving Cheney the tie-breaking vote and committee chairs to the Republicans. I’m sure that would be worth the committee chair of Joementum’s choice to the Repubs. If the Dems pick up 2 or more Senate seats in ‘08, then we can tell him what to do to himself, and the Rs have 21 seats to defend, whereas the Dems have but 12. If the Ds can hold onto everything they currently have, like in ‘06 (not likely, I admit, but still…). So, ‘09 could be sweet. We’re rid of Dumbya, and Lie berman is rendered… meaningless.

  36. IMH said,

    January 14, 2007 at 6:54

    “Jesus said, “Love your enemies.â€?”

    But it wouldn’t be as fun if we did that, now would it?

    Also, Christian, nice effort, but Woundwort still holds the title…

  37. chimera said,

    January 14, 2007 at 10:46

    Joementum ain’t gonna switch parties. He’s gotta stay a Dem so he can run with St. John in ‘08 on a happy-happy-joy-joy bipartisan ticket. IMHO.

Leave a Comment